What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the MG ZS deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the MG ZS delivers up to 197 HP.

How much fuel does the MG ZS use?

On average, the MG ZS consumes 5 L.

What is the top speed of the MG ZS?

Depending on the model, top speed is 179 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the MG ZS?

The MG ZS measures 4430 mm long, 1818 mm wide and 1635 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Renault Arkana?

Up to 143 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Renault Arkana use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.70 L.

How many kWh does the Renault Arkana’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 0.60 kWh.

What are the Renault Arkana’s length, width and height?

Length 4568 mm, width 1821 mm, height 1576 mm – those are the dimensions of the Renault Arkana.

MG ZS vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10466 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a evident edge – offering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MG ZS performs barely noticeable better – reaching 179 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Arkana pulls distinct stronger with 205 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 57 Nm difference.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG ZS is slightly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers barely noticeable more room – 480 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 37 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs to a small extent better – up to 1457 L, which is about 194 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, MG ZS minimal takes the win – 470 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Renault Arkana

Renault Symbioz

VS

The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …

MG ZS

Nissan Qashqai

VS

Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …

Costs and Consumption
Price 18000 - 24000 £	Price 28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 5 - 6.5 L	Consumption L/100km 4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 0.60 kWh
co2 113 - 145 g/km	co2 106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 41 - 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1330 - 1420 kg	Curb weight 1510 kg
Trunk capacity 443 L	Trunk capacity 480 L
Length 4430 mm	Length 4568 mm
Width 1818 mm	Width 1821 mm
Height 1635 mm	Height 1576 mm
Max trunk capacity 1457 L	Max trunk capacity 1263 L
Payload 375 - 470 kg	Payload 451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol	Engine Type Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 116 - 197 HP	Power HP 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 12.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.80 s
Max Speed 168 - 179 km/h	Max Speed 172 km/h
Torque 148 Nm	Torque 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 85 - 145 kW	Power kW 105 kW
Engine capacity 1495 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 1598 cm3