VS

MG ZS vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (18000 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Renault Arkana?

MG ZS vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively cheaper
  • evident more power
  • evident quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • hardly perceptible more efficient
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10466 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a evident edge – offering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Arkana pulls distinct stronger with 205 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 57 Nm difference.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG ZS is slightly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

When it comes to payload, MG ZS minimal takes the win – 470 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
MG ZS
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.5 L
details

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Reviews Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

MG ZS
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
18000 - 24000 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1818 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
MG
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Peugeot 2008 emerge as formidable contenders, each with their unique appeal. The MG ZS impresses with its value-focused proposition, offering ample space and a suite of features at an attractive price point. Meanwhile, the stylish Peugeot …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga stands out with its stylish design and advanced technology features, appealing to those who prioritize both performance and comfort. On the other hand, the MG ZS offers an impressive value proposition, boasting a spacious interior and a strong …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the Renault Arkana and the Renault Captur, both models present unique offerings in the compact SUV category. The Arkana stands out with its coupe-inspired design, providing a sportier profile and an engaging driving experience, ideal for those seeking an adventurous edge. In contrast, the …
MG ZS
Opel Mokka
VS
When comparing the MG ZS and the Opel Mokka, both compact SUVs offer unique features catering to different preferences. The MG ZS stands out with its affordable price and spacious interior, making it a great choice for families. On the other hand, the Opel Mokka appeals with its sleek design, …
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.