VS

MG ZS vs SsangYong Rexton comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or SsangYong Rexton?

MG ZS vs SsangYong Rexton: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

Rexton

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Rexton offers marginally more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Rexton delivers considerably more torque with 441 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 293 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is clearly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 815 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers significantly more boot space – 784 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 341 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries clearly more – 770 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 300 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
MG ZS
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Frank Williams CPA/ ACCA/ CPD
22 Jan 2026, 01:20:01

Ssang Yong Rexton is better than the Land Cruiser

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the MG ZS are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling in a city-friendly package. The Kona leans toward sharper handling and a more refined drive, while the ZS competes on value and generous equipment—so your priorities for driving feel, features and budget will …
MG ZS
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Peugeot 2008 helps you weigh a value-focused, roomy compact SUV against a more stylish, composed rival with sharper handling and premium touches. This short guide highlights differences in space, equipment, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Kia Niro
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Niro and MG ZS are compact crossovers that both promise practical space and everyday usability, but they take different routes — the Niro leans on efficiency, refinement and proven hybrid/electric technology, while the ZS competes on sharp pricing and generous equipment. If you prioritise …
MG ZS
Opel Frontera
VS
The MG ZS and Opel Frontera make very different promises: the ZS is a modern, budget-friendly compact SUV focused on efficiency and daily comfort, while the Frontera is a more traditional, rugged SUV aimed at tougher terrain and towing. Below I’ll compare them across space, driving dynamics, …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
-
Length
4,850 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Height
-
Height
1,825 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
MG
Brand
SsangYong
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.