Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether MG ZS or Toyota RAV4 fits your lifestyle better.
The SUV segment is fiercely competitive and, in this battle, two vehicles stand out—the MG ZS and the Toyota RAV4. Each of these SUVs brings its unique blend of performance, innovation, and practicality. But how do they compare in terms of engine options, interior space, and technological advancements? Let’s dive deeper into their specs to find out.
The MG ZS offers an array of engine choices, catering to different preferences and needs. Available in Electric, Full Hybrid, and Petrol variants, the ZS provides power outputs ranging from 116 to 197 HP and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds. Its top speed is capped at 175 km/h. Meanwhile, the Toyota RAV4 focuses predominantly on hybrid technology with its Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid engines. It delivers a slightly higher horsepower that ranges from 218 to 306 HP, with its top speed nudging up to 180 km/h and the quickest acceleration pegged at 6 seconds flat.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor in the SUV market. The MG ZS electric variant particularly shines here with a consumption rate of 17.8 kWh/100km and an impressive electric range of up to 440 km, while its fuel-driven counterparts have varying consumption between 5 and 6.5 L/100km. Toyota’s RAV4 Plugin Hybrid variant boasts an extremely low consumption of just 1 L/100km, with an electric range of 75 km, underscoring its eco-friendliness with a CO2 efficiency class of B.
Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, yet they differ in cargo capacity. The MG ZS offers a trunk space ranging from 443 to 448 liters, which meets the practical needs for urban commuting and light travel. In contrast, the RAV4 comes with a more generous trunk capacity of 520 to 580 liters, providing additional space for longer travels and family road trips.
The MG ZS measures up at a length of 4323 to 4430 mm, with a height of 1635 to 1649 mm and a width that stretches slightly slimmer at 1809 to 1818 mm. Meanwhile, the RAV4 has a larger footprint, with a length of 4600 mm, width of 1855 mm, and a height of 1685 mm, embodying a robust stance.
The MG ZS and Toyota RAV4 cater to modern-day tech enthusiasts in different ways. The MG ZS emphasizes its electric and hybrid efficiencies, highlighting advanced battery technologies with capacities up to 65.7 kWh. On the other hand, the RAV4 integrates Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive and an available All-Wheel Drive setup, enhancing traction and driving dynamics.
The choice between the MG ZS and Toyota RAV4 ultimately depends on your priorities. If sustainability and innovative electric technology are paramount, the MG ZS is a compelling choice. Conversely, if you're looking for powerful hybrid performance with ample cargo space, the RAV4 stands out. Both SUVs offer diverse and worthy options in the crowded SUV arena, promising to meet the demands of various drivers.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £, while the Toyota RAV4 costs 35100 £. That’s a price difference of around 17143 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota RAV4 manages with 1 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 4 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota RAV4 has a evident edge – offering 306 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota RAV4 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota RAV4 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG ZS is noticeable lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1745 kg. The difference is around 415 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Toyota RAV4 offers evident more room – 580 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 137 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Toyota RAV4 performs to a small extent better – up to 1690 L, which is about 233 L more than the MG ZS.
When it comes to payload, Toyota RAV4 distinct takes the win – 600 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 130 kg.
The Toyota RAV4 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota RAV4 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
The Toyota RAV4 feels like a sensible friend on the road, marrying dependable practicality with a dash of SUV personality that keeps daily driving from turning dull. Comfortable and easy to live with, it looks tough without shouting and quietly gets the job done — a sensible pick for buyers who want versatility without drama.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18000 - 24000 £
|
Price
35100 - 55700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 - 145 g/km
|
co2
22 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
|
Curb weight
1745 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
443 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 580 L
|
|
Length
4430 mm
|
Length
4600 mm
|
|
Width
1818 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1635 mm
|
Height
1685 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1604 - 1690 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
390 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2487 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España