Compare performance (197 HP vs 309 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 37,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Toyota RAV4?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The SUV segment is fiercely competitive and, in this battle, two vehicles stand out—the MG ZS and the Toyota RAV4. Each of these SUVs brings its unique blend of performance, innovation, and practicality. But how do they compare in terms of engine options, interior space, and technological advancements? Let’s dive deeper into their specs to find out.
The MG ZS offers an array of engine choices, catering to different preferences and needs. Available in Electric, Full Hybrid, and Petrol variants, the ZS provides power outputs ranging from 116 to 197 HP and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds. Its top speed is capped at 175 km/h. Meanwhile, the Toyota RAV4 focuses predominantly on hybrid technology with its Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid engines. It delivers a slightly higher horsepower that ranges from 218 to 306 HP, with its top speed nudging up to 180 km/h and the quickest acceleration pegged at 6 seconds flat.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor in the SUV market. The MG ZS electric variant particularly shines here with a consumption rate of 17.8 kWh/100km and an impressive electric range of up to 440 km, while its fuel-driven counterparts have varying consumption between 5 and 6.5 L/100km. Toyota’s RAV4 Plugin Hybrid variant boasts an extremely low consumption of just 1 L/100km, with an electric range of 75 km, underscoring its eco-friendliness with a CO2 efficiency class of B.
Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, yet they differ in cargo capacity. The MG ZS offers a trunk space ranging from 443 to 448 liters, which meets the practical needs for urban commuting and light travel. In contrast, the RAV4 comes with a more generous trunk capacity of 520 to 580 liters, providing additional space for longer travels and family road trips.
The MG ZS measures up at a length of 4323 to 4430 mm, with a height of 1635 to 1649 mm and a width that stretches slightly slimmer at 1809 to 1818 mm. Meanwhile, the RAV4 has a larger footprint, with a length of 4600 mm, width of 1855 mm, and a height of 1685 mm, embodying a robust stance.
The MG ZS and Toyota RAV4 cater to modern-day tech enthusiasts in different ways. The MG ZS emphasizes its electric and hybrid efficiencies, highlighting advanced battery technologies with capacities up to 65.7 kWh. On the other hand, the RAV4 integrates Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive and an available All-Wheel Drive setup, enhancing traction and driving dynamics.
The choice between the MG ZS and Toyota RAV4 ultimately depends on your priorities. If sustainability and innovative electric technology are paramount, the MG ZS is a compelling choice. Conversely, if you're looking for powerful hybrid performance with ample cargo space, the RAV4 stands out. Both SUVs offer diverse and worthy options in the crowded SUV arena, promising to meet the demands of various drivers.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Toyota RAV4 costs 37,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota RAV4 uses 1.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota RAV4 offers noticeably more power – delivering 309 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota RAV4 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is noticeably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,655 kg. The difference is around 325 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota RAV4 offers a bit more boot space – 514 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota RAV4 carries clearly more – 610 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.
The Toyota RAV4 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.
details
The Toyota RAV4 is a well-rounded compact SUV that pairs everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed ride and generous cargo space, making it a sensible choice for families and active lifestyles. Its strong reputation for reliability, efficient drivetrains, and straightforward technology gives it wide appeal whether you value economy, comfort, or capability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
37,700 - 54,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.3 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
133 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
30 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
1,655 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
443 L
|
Trunk capacity
446 - 514 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,880 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
515 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
185 - 309 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
136 - 227 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España