VS

MG ZS vs VW Touran comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or VW Touran?

MG ZS vs VW Touran: Key differences

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • barely more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

VW Touran

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the VW Touran costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,004 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the VW Touran with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Touran

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Touran delivers clearly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 212 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is moderately lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,520 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Touran carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 131 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
If you want a car-like family MPV with a polished interior, refined ride and tidy handling, the VW Touran feels like the grown-up choice for daily driving and longer trips. But if practicality rules—max cargo, sliding doors and a no-nonsense, van-like toughness—the VW Caddy is the smarter pick for …
MG ZS
VW Touran

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

VW Touran

The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.

details
DB2015AU01084_retina_2400
DB2015AU01088_retina_2400
DB2015AU01085_retina_2400
DB2015AU01093_retina_2400
DB2015AU01090_retina_2400

Reviews VW Touran

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW Tiguan
VW Touran
VS
Pick the Tiguan if you want SUV presence, a higher driving position and sharper styling — it’s the more grown-up, weekend-ready choice with modern tech and a bit of attitude. The Touran, by contrast, is the pragmatic family hero: lower, roomier and endlessly adaptable, with clever seating and …
VW Touran
VW Tayron
VS
The VW Touran remains the no-nonsense family workhorse — clever 7-seat packaging, sliding rear seats and sensible engines make it the practical choice when boot space and child seats are top priorities. The VW Tayron, by contrast, dresses up as a chunky SUV with higher stance and sharper styling, …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Touran
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Skoda Octavia Combi brings sleek looks, a big boot and crisp road manners, while the VW Touran counters with seven seats, sliding practicality and that boxy charm only an MPV can wear proudly. If you crave car-like drive and great value, go Octavia; if school runs and …
MG ZS
MG HS
VS
The MG ZS and MG HS are closely related SUVs that target buyers seeking compact practicality and modern features without luxury-car prices. The ZS emphasises affordability and efficient urban use, while the HS offers more space, stronger engines and extra equipment, so your choice comes down to …
Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold styling and tech-savvy interior, appealing to both young professionals and families alike. Meanwhile, the MG ZS offers excellent value with a spacious cabin and advanced safety features, making it a practical …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
The MG ZS and Nissan Juke represent two compelling options in the compact SUV segment, each appealing to distinct consumer preferences. While the ZS boasts a spacious interior and impressive value for money, the Juke stands out with its bold, iconic design and spirited performance. Ultimately, the …
MG ZS
VW Touran

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
36,000 - 45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
136 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
MPV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,520 - 1,631 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
834 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
590 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
MG
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.