Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Fiat Grande Panda comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 113 HP), boot space and price (25,500 £ vs 16,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Fiat Grande Panda?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Fiat Grande Panda is significantly cheaper – starting at 16,300 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 25,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,180 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is visibly more efficient: consuming 14 kWh/100km compared to 16.8 kWh/100km for the Fiat Grande Panda. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the MINI Aceman offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 405 km, about 85 km more than the Fiat Grande Panda.
Grande Panda
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers significantly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Fiat Grande Panda takes 11.2 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the MINI Aceman is somewhat faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Fiat Grande Panda tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers considerably more torque with 350 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm more.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Fiat Grande Panda is markedly lighter – 1,295 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 425 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Fiat Grande Panda offers noticeably more boot space – 412 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Fiat Grande Panda offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,366 L, about 361 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries moderately more – 530 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £25,500
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
Fiat Grande Panda
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Fiat Grande Panda
The Grande Panda is a delightful blend of practicality and charm, making it a popular choice for urban dwellers and families alike. With its compact design, the car navigates city streets effortlessly while providing ample interior space for passengers and cargo. Its quirky styling and user-friendly features make the Grande Panda not just a mode of transport, but a fun driving experience.
details
MINI Aceman
Fiat Grande Panda
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,500 - 36,200 £
|
Price
16,300 - 25,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
320 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 131 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
1,295 - 1,554 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
361 - 412 L
|
|
Length
4,079 mm
|
Length
3,999 mm
|
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
Width
1,763 mm
|
|
Height
1,514 mm
|
Height
1,598 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,366 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
353 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 113 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 - 11.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
122 - 205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Fiat
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.