VS

MINI Aceman vs Mercedes EQA comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 228 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Mercedes EQA?

MINI Aceman vs Mercedes EQA: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more electric range
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MINI Aceman is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,874 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers visibly more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 121 km more than the MINI Aceman.

EQA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers somewhat more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers a bit more torque with 390 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is visibly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 395 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQA offers somewhat more boot space – 340 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries somewhat more – 530 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
MINI Aceman
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
Mercedes CLA Coupe
Mercedes EQA
VS
In an electrifying matchup between the sleek Mercedes CLA Coupé and the innovative Mercedes EQA, drivers are offered a choice between potent gasoline dynamics and forward-thinking electric efficiency. The CLA Coupé enchants with its elegant design and turbocharged performance, tailored for driving …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
Comparing the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA brings together two compact electric SUVs with different personalities: the iX2 favours sporty handling and driver engagement, while the EQA prioritises comfort and a polished Mercedes interior. Which suits you will come down to priorities like range, cabin …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes EQB
VS
In the battle of electric luxury, the Mercedes EQA and EQB showcase the brand's commitment to sustainable performance. While the EQA offers a sleek, compact design ideal for urban environments, the EQB’s spacious interior and added versatility make it a compelling choice for families. Both models …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLC
VS
Mercedes EQA and Mercedes GLC go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30
VS
In the highly anticipated showdown between the MINI Aceman and the Volvo EX30, both electric vehicles bring their unique flair to the compact SUV market. The MINI Aceman captivates with its playful design and nimble handling, embodying the brand's spirited character, while the Volvo EX30 impresses …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
MINI Aceman
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
340 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
228 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
390 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
168 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MINI
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.