VS

MINI Aceman vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Mitsubishi Colt?

MINI Aceman vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Colt is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,838 £.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers considerably more torque with 350 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is considerably lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 531 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers noticeably more boot space – 391 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries markedly more – 530 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30
VS
In the highly anticipated showdown between the MINI Aceman and the Volvo EX30, both electric vehicles bring their unique flair to the compact SUV market. The MINI Aceman captivates with its playful design and nimble handling, embodying the brand's spirited character, while the Volvo EX30 impresses …
MINI Aceman
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
All-New COLT_003

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Clio
VS
Mitsubishi Colt and Renault Clio go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
MINI Aceman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Aceman and the Volkswagen ID.3 offer two distinct takes on the compact electric car: the Aceman leans on MINI’s character and driver-focused feel, while the ID.3 emphasizes efficiency, roomy interior and everyday practicality. This comparison will cut through the specs to show where they …
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model 3
VS
Unsure whether the MINI Aceman or the Tesla Model 3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MINI Aceman
VW ID.Polo
VS
The MINI Aceman and VW ID.Polo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Colt
VS
The Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Colt compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
MINI Aceman
CUPRA Raval
VS
The MINI Aceman and CUPRA Raval compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi Colt
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Mitsubishi Colt and Toyota Yaris compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
CUPRA Born
MINI Aceman
VS
In a thrilling matchup between the CUPRA Born and the MINI Aceman, two distinct philosophies collide: the Born embodies a bold, sporty electric performance while the Aceman embraces a playful, retro-inspired design. Both cars shine with their unique features, offering exciting driving dynamics and …
MINI Aceman
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
MINI
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.