VS

MINI Aceman vs Vauxhall Frontera comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Vauxhall Frontera?

MINI Aceman vs Vauxhall Frontera: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Vauxhall Frontera

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • slightly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Vauxhall Frontera is noticeably cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,266 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the Vauxhall Frontera. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Vauxhall Frontera offers slightly more range – reaching up to 408 km, about 53 km more than the MINI Aceman.

Frontera

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Vauxhall Frontera takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers noticeably more torque with 350 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Vauxhall Frontera offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Frontera is clearly lighter – 1,394 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Frontera offers clearly more boot space – 460 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.

When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Frontera carries marginally more – 570 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3 Aircross
Opel Frontera
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Citroen C3 Aircross showcases its compact versatility and modern styling, appealing to urban drivers seeking practicality without compromising on flair. On the other hand, the Opel Frontera offers rugged capability and a robust design, perfect for those craving …
Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Frontera is a rugged, old-school SUV that trades creature comforts for go-anywhere attitude—perfect for buyers after analogue charm, simple mechanics and mud under the wheel arches. The Opel Mokka is the polished city slicker: compact, efficient and loaded with modern tech and safety …
MINI Aceman
Vauxhall Frontera

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Vauxhall Frontera

The Opel Frontera wears its rugged, go-anywhere intentions proudly, serving up a simple, no-nonsense package that feels as comfortable off the beaten track as it does at the supermarket. It won’t set hearts racing with glamour, but its honest practicality and rugged charm make it a smart pick for buyers who prefer substance over style.

details
NewOpelFronteraElectric
NewOpelFronteraElectric (1)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (2)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (3)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (4)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (5)
NewOpelFronteraElectric (7)

Reviews Vauxhall Frontera

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Wolfgang
6 May 2026, 04:24:52

I just like the Opel better (maybe only because I'm very disappointed in VW and therefore also in its subsidiaries).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gilbert
14 Apr 2026, 08:19:17

I bought the Opel Frontera GS 145PS after also testing the VW T‑Roc; so far I've driven about 5,800 km in it.

My purchase decision was based on the following criteria:
- modern design that stands out from the crowd
- low fuel consumption
- very good seats and plenty of space front and rear
- large, practical boot
- good performance characteristics
- very easy to get into
- simple controls, partly with physical buttons
- clear, well‑laid‑out cockpit

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
H. P.
19 Dec 2025, 13:27:19

Opel has clearly skimped here. Misaligned panel gaps, no position/parking light, patchy workmanship and ill‑fitting parts — for example the partition between the passenger footwell and the engine bay — the owner's manual is inadequate and at times reads like a fairy tale; many of the functions it describes are nowhere to be found. They simply don't exist. And the claimed fuel consumption? Even with normal driving — that is, without acceleration orgies — it's unattainable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Opel Grandland
VS
The Frontera feels like a bruiser from the analogue era — raw, rugged and surprisingly capable off-road, ideal if you crave adventure and don't mind a bit of mechanical charm. The Grandland, by contrast, is a slick, family-friendly crossover loaded with modern tech, efficient engines and a …
Opel Frontera
Renault R4
VS
Choosing between the Opel Frontera and the Renault 4 is a clash of eras and purpose: the Frontera brings 1990s SUV practicality and off‑road capability, while the Renault 4 (commonly called the R4) offers lightweight simplicity and economical charm. This comparison will focus on how their design, …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Frontera and Suzuki Vitara are both compact SUVs that appeal to buyers who want a capable, practical vehicle, but they take different approaches — the Frontera leans toward a sturdier, more spacious package while the Vitara focuses on light off-road ability, efficiency and city-friendly …
Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Kia Sportage
Opel Frontera
VS
The Kia Sportage and Vauxhall Frontera take very different approaches to the SUV market — the Sportage emphasizes everyday practicality, refinement and value, while the Frontera leans toward rugged capability and simple, go-anywhere robustness. In this head-to-head we’ll compare driving feel, …
Dacia Duster
Opel Frontera
VS
The Dacia Duster is the sensible new-school pick — affordable, economical and surprisingly well packaged with modern safety and infotainment for the money; the Opel Frontera, meanwhile, is a proper old-school body-on-frame bruiser that still appeals to buyers who prize simple, rugged off-road …
Omoda 5
Opel Frontera
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the Frontera comes down to whether you prioritise modern tech and city-friendly refinement or off-road capability and rugged practicality. I’ll walk you through the key differences in performance, interior, running costs and ownership to help you pick the right one.
Citroen C3
Opel Frontera
VS
Here’s a quick comparison between the Citroën C3 and the Vauxhall Frontera. The C3 is a practical, economical city hatchback focused on easy driving and low running costs, while the Frontera is a larger, more rugged SUV aimed at buyers who need space, towing capacity and occasional off-road …
MINI Aceman
Vauxhall Frontera

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
20,700 - 30,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
308 - 408 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,394 - 1,610 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
460 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
436 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
110 - 145 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 14.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
81 - 107 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
MINI
Brand
Vauxhall
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.