Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs smart #3 – Differences & prices compared
Aceman
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £, while the smart #3 costs 34700 £. That’s a price difference of around 9248 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the smart #3 with 16.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.30 kWh.
As for range, the smart #3 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 455 km, about 50 km more than the MINI Aceman.
#3
@ smart Europe GmbH
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 has a evident edge – offering 428 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs barely noticeable better – reaching 200 km/h, while the smart #3 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: smart #3 pulls significantly stronger with 584 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 234 Nm difference.
Aceman
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is minimal lighter – 1720 kg compared to 1780 kg. The difference is around 60 kg.
In terms of boot space, the smart #3 offers somewhat more room – 370 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
In maximum load capacity, the smart #3 performs somewhat better – up to 1160 L, which is about 155 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman a bit takes the win – 530 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
Who wins the race?
The smart #3 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
smart #3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
MINI Aceman
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,700
@ smart Europe GmbH
smart #3
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
smart #3
5 (1 Reviews)
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
MINI Aceman
smart #3
|
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
|
@ smart Europe GmbH
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4400 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1844 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
smart
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.