Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi ASX vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (158 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Land Rover Range Rover?
Mitsubishi ASX vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ASX
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi ASX is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 103,466 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 392 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 555 Nm more.
ASX
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is considerably lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 1,208 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more boot space – 818 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 334 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries clearly more – 846 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 401 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £125,200
Land Rover Range Rover
Mitsubishi ASX
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi ASX
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
99 - 136 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.