VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Mazda CX-5?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,571 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX offers moderately more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers barely more torque with 245 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is visibly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 333 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers slightly more boot space – 583 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 99 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries visibly more – 601 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 156 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mitsubishi ASX
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the showdown between the Honda HR-V and the Mazda CX-5, the HR-V impresses with its spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers and small families. Meanwhile, the CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and robust performance, offering a more …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Mitsubishi ASX
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
-
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Mazda
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.