VS

Mitsubishi Colt vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

Mitsubishi Colt vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

Mitsubishi Colt

  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Colt

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Colt is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,266 £.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 344 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 790 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is substantially lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 972 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more boot space – 519 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 128 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries moderately more – 450 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Mitsubishi Colt
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
Mitsubishi Colt
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
96 - 119 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
4,053 mm
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
1,439 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
381 - 385 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
174 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.