Compare performance (143 HP vs 90 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Hyundai i20?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Mitsubishi Colt have been turning heads with their blend of style, efficiency, and cutting-edge technology. These small but mighty vehicles are perfect for urban adventurers and eco-conscious drivers alike. Let's dive into a detailed comparison, assessing their technical features and innovations.
The Hyundai i20 comes with a choice of Petrol MHEV and Petrol engines, offering versatility with a Dual-Clutch Automatic or Manual Gearbox. The engine power ranges from 79 HP to 100 HP, translating to a smooth drive with top speeds between 166 and 183 km/h. The torque varies from 113 Nm to 200 Nm across different variants, ensuring a responsive and energetic performance.
On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Colt provides a diverse powertrain lineup, including Petrol and Full Hybrid engines. It features Manual and Automatic transmissions, with engine power options spanning from 67 HP to 143 HP. The top speed for the Colt caps at 174 km/h, with torque figures ranging from 95 Nm to 160 Nm. The Full Hybrid variant distinguishes itself with enhanced fuel efficiency and eco-friendliness.
Both hatchbacks cater to budget-conscious drivers with excellent fuel efficiency. The Hyundai i20 boasts a fuel consumption of 5.1 to 5.3 L/100km, while the Mitsubishi Colt offers similar consumption at 4.2 to 5.4 L/100km, particularly impressive in the hybrid variant.
Inside, both cars comfortably seat five passengers. The Hyundai i20 offers a spacious trunk with a capacity of 352 liters, making it ideal for everyday errands and weekend getaways. The Mitsubishi Colt, with its trunk capacity ranging from 301 to 391 liters, offers flexibility in its various models, catering to diverse hauling needs.
The Hyundai i20 is slightly larger in dimensions, providing a bit more room with a length of 4075 mm, width of 1775 mm, and height of 1455 mm. Comparatively, the Mitsubishi Colt's dimensions are compact with a length of 4053 mm, width of 1798 mm, and height of 1439 mm, making it a perfect fit for tight parking spaces.
Hyundai consistently integrates smart technology in their vehicles, and the i20 is no exception. It comes equipped with modern driver-assistance systems, connectivity options, and efficient energy management in its MHEV variant.
Mitsubishi incorporates advanced safety features and eco-technologies in the Colt, especially in the Full Hybrid variant. This ensures not only a sustainable driving experience but also a safe one, thanks to its comprehensive array of safety systems.
In conclusion, both the Hyundai i20 and Mitsubishi Colt have proven to be commendable hatchbacks that address different driver preferences. The i20 is geared towards those seeking a balance of performance with mild hybrid efficiency, while the Colt shines with its Full Hybrid technology and varied powertrain options.
Ultimately, the choice between these two stylish models depends on individual priorities—be it innovative hybrid technology, performance prowess, or inner-city maneuverability. Both brands continue to push the envelope, setting new benchmarks in the compact car category.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi Colt is barely cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Hyundai i20 costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 652 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Hyundai i20 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Colt offers noticeably more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Colt is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.3 s, while the Hyundai i20 takes 11.5 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai i20 delivers barely more torque with 172 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Hyundai i20 is very slightly lighter – 1,145 kg compared to 1,189 kg. The difference is around 44 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers barely more boot space – 391 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai i20 carries somewhat more – 465 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
The Mitsubishi Colt is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
The Hyundai i20 is a cheeky small car that mixes smart styling with sensible practicality, feeling more polished and roomy than you might expect for the money. It’s an easy car to live with, offering engaging handling, a comfy cabin and useful equipment that make daily commutes and weekend errands notably less dull.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
Price
18,800 - 24,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
co2
128 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
Curb weight
1,145 - 1,170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
Width
1,775 mm
|
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Payload
455 - 465 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
90 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.5 - 12.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
Torque
172 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
66 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España