Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Tesla Model Y - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 627 HP), boot space and price (41100 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Tesla Model Y?
Eclipse Cross
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Tesla Model Y has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34300 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model Y: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 16.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 635 km, about 13 km more than the Tesla Model Y.
Model Y
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y has a convincingly edge – offering 627 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 409 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.90 s. That’s about 4.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model Y performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model Y pulls distinct stronger with 493 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Eclipse Cross
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers significantly more room – 822 L compared to 487 L. That’s a difference of about 335 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Tesla Model Y performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2138 L, which is about 468 L more than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model Y is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Tesla Model Y
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Tesla Model Y
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
4.9 (1 Reviews)
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.
details
Tesla Model Y
4.3 (3 Reviews)
The Tesla Model Y blends SUV practicality with sports-car poke, wrapping a roomy, minimalist cabin and handy hatch into a slick, aerodynamic package that feels more Silicon Valley gadget than garage ornament. It’s an ideal pick for buyers who want effortless electric driving, regular software improvements and access to Tesla’s convenient charging network, though style-conscious shoppers should know it’s more about tech and efficiency than classic luxury.
details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Tesla Model Y
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41100 - 48200 £
|
Price
34300 - 53100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 16.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
635 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 622 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 85 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1976 - 2108 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
487 L
|
Trunk capacity
822 L
|
|
Length
4489 mm
|
Length
4790 - 4797 mm
|
|
Width
1908 mm
|
Width
1921 mm
|
|
Height
1571 mm
|
Height
1611 - 1624 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1670 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2022 - 2138 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
440 - 472 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
Power HP
299 - 627 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 493 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
Power kW
220 - 461 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Tesla
|
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.