VS

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (306 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Outlander or Honda CR-V?

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Honda CR-V

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Outlander

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Honda CR-V is only slightly cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,648 £.

Both cars consume an average of 2.6 L/100km – no difference here.

As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 85 km, about 7 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers clearly more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Outlander is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

Outlander

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is somewhat lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers slightly more boot space – 617 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 119 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Outlander carries a bit more – 529 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Outlander is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
Outlander

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 83 - 85 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
The Honda CR-V and Lexus NX are two of the most sensible compact crossovers on the market—one prized for roomy practicality and strong value, the other for luxury, refinement and a more premium driving experience. This comparison shows how the CR-V’s efficient, user-friendly package stacks up …
Mitsubishi Outlander
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
VIC01568-HDR-Edit-Edit-2
25_Outlander_DSC05046
25_Outlander_DSC05200

Reviews Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Vinces
3 Jun 2026, 11:34:17

It's better to choose the modes yourself (electric/internal-combustion) than to let the car decide.
Plenty of storage, but small.
Good handling, reasonable fuel consumption off the highway, but penalizing on the highway.
Lots of annoying "driver-assistance" features, fortunately deactivatable, but you have to do it at every start.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mónica Tobón
8 May 2026, 17:25:26

Me gusta un carro más potente y la marca de fabricación Japonesa me gusta mucho

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mark Joe
4 May 2026, 06:33:44

Best Outlander

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Henk van der Werf
1 Jun 2026, 20:15:51

The fuel economy you report in your test is, of course, nonsense. This is a plug-in, and so you're being fooled. Of course a CR‑V isn't more economical than an HR‑V. Think!

Roger
23 May 2026, 22:21:51

My 2026 CR‑V hybrid has had no problems. It’s quieter than my previous 2019 RAV4 hybrid. The exterior finish feels more solid across the whole vehicle. It’s less affected by crosswinds. I prefer the CR‑V’s driving. Its only drawback is that it uses just a little more fuel than the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
19 May 2026, 07:08:56

Very comfortable, lots of space, combined fuel consumption about 6 l, reliable, simple to operate, without unnecessary gadgets, very well made, easy to drive, a car for the city and long trips.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mitsubishi Outlander
MG MGS9
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mitsubishi Outlander …
Ford Kuga
Honda CR-V
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga stands out with its sporty design and agile handling, offering a dynamic driving experience that appeals to enthusiasts. In contrast, the Honda CR-V impresses with its reputation for reliability and spacious interior, making it a family-friendly …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 comes down to practical reliability and value versus premium comfort and advanced safety tech. The CR-V is a roomy, efficient family SUV with low running costs, while the XC60 focuses on a refined interior, stronger safety credentials and a more …
BMW X1
Honda CR-V
VS
BMW X1 and Honda CR-V go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW X1 or the Honda CR-V is the …
Honda CR-V
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V continues to impress with its blend of reliability and advanced technology, offering a spacious interior and a reputation for efficiency. On the other hand, the Dacia Bigster makes a compelling case as a more budget-friendly alternative, boasting a …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out …
Honda CR-V
Mercedes GLA
VS
Honda CR-V and Mercedes GLA go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the Mercedes …
Mitsubishi Outlander
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
60 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
498 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,862 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 529 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
-
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
306 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
225 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Honda
Is the Mitsubishi Outlander offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi Outlander is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.