Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Ford Bronco comparison
Compare performance (71 HP vs 335 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 58,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Ford Bronco?
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Ford Bronco: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Space Star
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,594 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 6.4 L/100km.
Bronco
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers significantly more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 264 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 7.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers significantly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 461 Nm more.
Space Star
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 1,349 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Bronco offers clearly more boot space – 562 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Bronco carries only slightly more – 411 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mitsubishi Space Star holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £11,600
Mitsubishi Space Star
Mitsubishi Space Star
Ford Bronco
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Ford Bronco
The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Ford Bronco
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
co2
257 - 288 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
|
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
|
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Payload
387 - 411 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
Power HP
335 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
Torque
563 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
6
|
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
Power kW
246 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.