VS

Ford Bronco vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Skoda Kodiaq?

Ford Bronco vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • clearly more power
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq is substantially cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,365 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 9.8 L/100km.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers clearly more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Ford Bronco takes 6.7 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers clearly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 163 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is visibly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more boot space – 910 L compared to 562 L. That’s a difference of about 348 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries clearly more – 563 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 152 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
Ford Bronco
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
Ford Bronco
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2023
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.