VS

Ford Bronco vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (335 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (58200 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Skoda Kodiaq?

Ford Bronco

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21394 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.30 L. The difference is about 9.80 L per 100 km.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco has a noticeable edge – offering 335 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Ford Bronco takes 6.70 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Ford Bronco tops out at 161 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Bronco pulls distinct stronger with 563 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 163 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is distinct lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2289 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers distinct more room – 910 L compared to 562 L. That’s a difference of about 348 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs somewhat better – up to 2105 L, which is about 301 L more than the Ford Bronco.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq noticeable takes the win – 563 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 152 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Bronco
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details
FordBronco_CGrey_Dynamic_5-LOW
FordBronco_HPRed_Static_V9-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_03-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_04-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS__INTERIOR_28-LOW

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Ford Bronco

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Ford Bronco
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
58200 - 60000 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
79 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2289 - 2418 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4800 - 4811 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1928 - 1937 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1938 - 1962 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1780 - 1804 L
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
161 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
2694 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Audi Q5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of mid-size SUVs, the Audi Q5 and Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct yet compelling choices. The Audi Q5 impresses with its refined interior, advanced technology, and a range of powerful engine options, making it a prime choice for those seeking luxury and performance. Meanwhile, the Skoda …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium …
What drivetrain options does the Ford Bronco have?

The Ford Bronco is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.