VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Renault Kangoo comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Renault Kangoo?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Renault Kangoo: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Renault Kangoo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Kangoo

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Kangoo offers significantly more power – delivering 130 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 11.6 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo delivers clearly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 168 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,489 kg. The difference is around 549 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers considerably more boot space – 775 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 540 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo carries visibly more – 610 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 210 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Kangoo is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
Kangoo

Renault Kangoo

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot Partner
Renault Kangoo
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot Partner and the Renault Kangoo comes down to practical needs—cargo space, driver comfort and running costs—rather than style alone. This comparison looks at real-world load capacity, fuel/energy efficiency, trim and equipment choices, and ownership costs to help you …
Peugeot Rifter
Renault Kangoo
VS
Comparing the Peugeot Rifter and the Renault Kangoo is a practical look at two versatile, family‑friendly MPVs that also serve well as light work vans. The Rifter offers a more car‑like driving feel and contemporary styling, while the Kangoo focuses on cargo flexibility and clever utility for …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Kangoo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.2 (3 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Kangoo

The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.

details
r221168p
r221165p
r221166p
r221163p
r221155p
r221162p

Reviews Renault Kangoo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Opel Combo
Renault Kangoo
VS
Opel Combo and Renault Kangoo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Tourneo Courier
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the bustling segment of compact vans, the Ford Tourneo Courier and the Renault Kangoo stand out as compelling choices for both families and small businesses. The Ford Tourneo Courier shines with its practicality and dynamic driving experience, offering a comfortable interior and advanced safety …
Renault Express
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the battle between the Renault Express and Renault Kangoo, both models offer practical solutions for urban mobility but cater to slightly different needs. The Express focuses on affordability and essential features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious consumers and small businesses. …
Mercedes Citan
Renault Kangoo
VS
The ongoing rivalry between the Mercedes Citan and the Renault Kangoo continues to captivate automotive enthusiasts, with both models appealing to those seeking versatility in compact vans. The Mercedes Citan distinguishes itself with its premium interior and sleek design, promising a touch of …
Renault Kangoo
Toyota Proace City
VS
Renault Kangoo vs Toyota Proace City — two compact workhorses that double as practical family vans. Both are aimed at buyers who need sensible space, low running costs and everyday usability, but they take slightly different approaches. Quick take - Kangoo: a more modern, versatile offering with a …
Fiat Doblò
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the battle of European light commercial vehicles, the Fiat Doblò and Renault Kangoo showcase distinct capabilities that cater to professional and family needs alike. The Fiat Doblò impresses with its robust engine options and a versatile cargo area, making it a reliable partner for …
Renault Kangoo
VW Caddy
VS
Renault Kangoo and VW Caddy go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Citroen Berlingo
Renault Kangoo
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Citroën Berlingo and Renault Kangoo stand out for their practicality and versatility. While the Berlingo offers a more spacious interior and an innovative modular design, the Kangoo impresses with its fuel efficiency and advanced safety features. …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Kangoo

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
25,700 - 32,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
136 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,489 - 1,830 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
500 - 775 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
459 - 610 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.