@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Nissan Ariya vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (435 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (37300 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Ariya or Volvo XC40?

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ariya @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Volvo XC40 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Nissan Ariya costs 37300 £. That’s a price difference of around 515 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya has a decisively edge – offering 435 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 238 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Nissan Ariya performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Ariya pulls decisively stronger with 600 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm difference.

Ariya @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is to a small extent lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1980 kg. The difference is around 292 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan Ariya offers minimal more room – 468 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Ariya performs slight better – up to 1350 L, which is about 22 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 distinct takes the win – 532 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Nissan Ariya proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Nissan Ariya is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £37,300
Ariya @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Ariya

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 - 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 24.5 kWh
  • Electric Range : 402 - 531 km
details
Nissan Ariya
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details
Ariya_2022_Highlights_High_007 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ariya_2022_Highlights_High_001 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ariya_2022_Statics_High_050 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ariya_2022_Dynamics_High_040 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ariya_2022_Statics_High_055 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ariya_2022_Interiors_High_091 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ariya_2022_Interiors_High_073 @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Nissan Ariya
Volvo XC40
Ariya @ Nissan Motor Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
37300 - 54800 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 24.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
402 - 531 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
63 - 87 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1980 - 2277 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
415 - 468 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4595 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1850 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1650 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1280 - 1350 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
363 - 420 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 - 435 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
300 - 600 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
160 - 320 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2022 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Ariya
VS
In the burgeoning electric SUV market, the Ford Explorer EV and Nissan Ariya stand out with their distinct features and performance metrics. The Explorer EV boasts a rugged design and impressive towing capacity, catering to those who need versatility, while the Ariya offers a sleek profile and an …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40 both present compelling choices with their distinct offerings. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical features, making it an ideal choice for families who value comfort and utility. On the other hand, the XC40 …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
What drivetrain options does the Nissan Ariya have?

The Nissan Ariya is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.