Compare performance (170 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Ford Transit Connect?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Transit Connect is somewhat cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,355 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers noticeably more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers slightly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 3 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is markedly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 478 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries clearly more – 1,447 kg compared to 780 kg. That’s a difference of about 667 kg.
The Nissan Interstar holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
co2
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|