Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Nissan Interstar vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (170 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Nissan Interstar vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
Interstar
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Interstar is slightly cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,126 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers considerably more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 343 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers noticeably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is moderately lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 261 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 847 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Interstar holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,200
Nissan Interstar
Nissan Interstar
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan Interstar
The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Nissan Interstar
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.