VS

Nissan Juke vs Audi A3 Sportback comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 400 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Audi A3 Sportback?

Nissan Juke vs Audi A3 Sportback: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Audi A3 Sportback

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Audi A3 Sportback costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,615 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

A3 Sportback

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 257 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers significantly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is very slightly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,360 kg. The difference is around 86 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers only slightly more boot space – 422 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi A3 Sportback carries somewhat more – 480 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 134 - 141 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the VW T‑Roc share many Volkswagen Group underpinnings but target different buyers: the A3 Sportback focuses on refined driving dynamics and premium cabin quality, while the VW T‑Roc offers a taller, more practical crossover package at a more value-driven price. This …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
Audi A3 Sportback

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details
A202267_overfull
A202258_overfull
A202235_overfull
A202271_overfull
A201906_overfull
A202227_overfull

Reviews Audi A3 Sportback

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Nissan Juke
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving experiences. The Juke offers a sportier edge with its agile handling and bold styling, while the 2008 impresses with a refined interior and advanced technology …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A3 Limousine
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Audi A3 Sportback and Audi A3 Limousine, both models showcase the brand's commitment to luxury and performance, yet cater to slightly different preferences. The Sportback impresses with its versatile hatchback design, offering enhanced cargo space and …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Comparing the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris Cross helps buyers choose between two compact crossovers with different strengths: the Juke offers bold styling and a punchy, fun-to-drive character, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes refinement, efficiency and everyday practicality. I’ll walk you …
Nissan Juke
Audi A3 Sportback

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
25 - 211 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
410 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Audi
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.