VS

Nissan Juke vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Mitsubishi ASX?

Nissan Juke vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Juke is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX offers barely more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers slightly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is only slightly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,296 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers slightly more boot space – 484 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi ASX carries very slightly more – 445 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Comparing the ASX and Vitara helps buyers choose between two compact SUVs with different strengths: the ASX leans toward comfort and value, while the Vitara emphasizes nimble handling and fuel efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in space, safety, economy and driving feel so you can …
Jeep Avenger
Nissan Juke
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Nissan Juke comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with Jeep’s rugged styling and practical options or the Juke’s quirky, city-focused design and agile handling. Below I’ll highlight the key differences in space, performance, efficiency and …
Nissan Juke
Toyota C-HR
VS
If you want a pint-sized crossover with cheeky looks and a go-kart-ish chassis, the Nissan Juke delivers character and punchy turbo performance that’s grin-inducing in town. The Toyota C-HR, meanwhile, trades theatrics for grown-up virtues — hybrid efficiency, a calmer ride and a more …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
The Nissan Juke and Renault Clio compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Nissan Juke
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
99 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.