VS

Nissan Juke vs Renault R5 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Renault R5?

Nissan Juke vs Renault R5: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Renault R5

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Juke is moderately cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Renault R5 costs 24,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,615 £.

R5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault R5 offers very slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault R5 delivers somewhat more torque with 245 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is moderately lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,447 kg. The difference is around 173 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers noticeably more boot space – 422 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Juke carries marginally more – 427 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,000
R5

Renault R5

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 307 - 405 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Kia EV2
VS
The Renault 5 and the Kia EV2 represent two different takes on the compact electric — the Renault 5 leans on retro styling and urban agility, while the Kia EV2 focuses on modern practicality and value. This comparison will help you decide between personality and usable space by looking at range, …
Renault R5
VW ID.Polo
VS
This short comparison pits the Renault 5 against the Volkswagen ID. Polo to help you choose which compact electric suits your needs. We'll focus on design, range, practicality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the right city car.
Nissan Juke
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Renault R5

The Renault 5 blends classic styling cues with contemporary design, giving it a playful and characterful presence on the road. It’s a city-focused hatchback that feels nimble and cleverly packaged, ideal for drivers who want personality and practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
Choosing between the retro-inspired Renault 5 and the practical VW ID.3 comes down to whether you value character and compact city agility or proven electric range and grown-up practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each car shines and which one fits different kinds …
Renault R5
Renault Twingo
VS
Deciding between the Renault 5 and the Renault Twingo comes down to whether you prefer the retro-inspired style and modern reinterpretation of the 5 or the Twingo’s proven compact practicality. This comparison focuses on driving character, interior space, running costs and everyday usability to …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Renault R5
Renault R4
VS
Choosing between the Renault 5 (R5) and the Renault 4 (R4) is a clash between two French icons: the R4’s rugged simplicity and practical load space versus the R5’s sharper styling, livelier driving feel and more modern features. If you want tough, no‑nonsense utility, lean to the R4; if you prefer …
Renault R5
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Renault R5 and the CUPRA Raval represent two very different takes on the compact electric car — the Renault R5 leans on retro charm and urban practicality, while the CUPRA Raval emphasizes sporty dynamics and bold design. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they stack up on …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Nissan Juke
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
24,000 - 27,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,744 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.