VS

Nissan Juke vs Toyota Proace Transporter comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Toyota Proace Transporter?

Nissan Juke vs Toyota Proace Transporter: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

Toyota Proace Transporter

  • barely more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Toyota Proace Transporter costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,250 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Toyota Proace Transporter with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Proace Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace Transporter offers barely more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the Toyota Proace Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 370 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is visibly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,656 kg. The difference is around 382 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries clearly more – 1,323 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 896 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Proace Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,600
Proace Transporter

Toyota Proace Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 120 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 349 km
Nissan Juke
Toyota Proace Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details

Toyota Proace Transporter

The Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.

details
Nissan Juke
Toyota Proace Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
349 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.