Compare performance (205 HP vs 138 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Kia Niro?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to the compact SUV segment, the Kia Niro and Nissan Qashqai often come up as top contenders. With a focus on sustainability and modern technology, both these models feature innovations that cater to a wide variety of needs. Let's dive into the details of what makes each of these SUVs unique and which might be the perfect fit for you.
The 2024 Kia Niro offers an impressive lineup with Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid powertrains. The Full Hybrid version delivers 129 HP, while the Plug-in Hybrid punches out 171 HP, courtesy of its dual-clutch automatic transmission and front-wheel drive system. Moreover, with an electric range of up to 65 km, the Niro ensures fuel efficiency with consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km, making it an attractive choice for eco-conscious drivers.
On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai comes with a variety of engine options, including Petrol MHEV and Full Hybrid powertrains. With output options ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP, the Qashqai manages to balance power with efficiency. The manual and CVT automatic transmissions paired with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive offer flexibility for different driving preferences. Though its fuel consumption starts at a slightly higher 5.1 L/100km, the Qashqai's well-rounded performance appeals to those seeking versatility.
In terms of dimensions, the Kia Niro is slightly more compact, measuring 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height. This size, combined with its sleek design, offers a modern look without compromising the spaciousness required for comfortable travel. With a trunk capacity of 451 liters, the Niro holds its ground in practicality.
The Nissan Qashqai, while slightly larger at 4425 mm in length, 1835 mm in width, and 1625 mm in height, offers more roominess, making it an ideal choice for families. With a notable trunk capacity of up to 504 liters, the Qashqai doesn’t fall short in terms of practicality, either.
Both SUVs come equipped with modern technological features that enhance the driving experience. The Kia Niro is laden with a suite of safety features and infotainment options that integrate seamlessly into daily life. Key highlights include advanced driver-assistance systems and connectivity features that make every journey safe and enjoyable.
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its innovative technology as well, offering an advanced infotainment system and a plethora of driver-assistance features. Its commitment to providing a futuristic driving experience can be seen through features such as its ProPILOT, which offers semi-autonomous driving capabilities under certain conditions.
Choosing between the Kia Niro and the Nissan Qashqai ultimately boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Kia Niro is perfect for those who prioritize eco-friendliness and efficient performance, making it a great option for city dwellers and environmental enthusiasts alike.
Alternatively, the Nissan Qashqai, with its variety of powertrains and flexible drive options, appeals to those seeking versatility and advanced technology in their SUV. This makes it an ideal contender for families or adventurers who require a reliable and spacious vehicle.
In the end, either vehicle delivers a remarkable combination of performance, design, and innovation, cementing their status as leading players in the compact SUV market.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Kia Niro is barely cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 471 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Kia Niro with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers visibly more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 67 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers a bit more torque with 330 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is barely lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries barely more – 516 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 152 g/km
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
446 - 516 kg
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Kia
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España