Compare performance (205 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or MG ZS?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact crossover clash pits the refreshingly affordable MG ZS against the seasoned and polished Nissan Qashqai. One plays the value card with bold styling and a friendly personality, the other leans on refinement and a reassuringly grown-up demeanor. It’s a duel between enthusiasm and composure, and whether you want to show savvy or stick to a safe bet depends on your daily priorities.
The MG ZS is an extrovert — bright face, eager grille and an energy that says “look at me” without trying too hard, while the Nissan Qashqai is the sleek neighbour that ages well and signals quiet confidence. The ZS flirts with trendiness and youthful optimism, the Qashqai prefers sculpted lines and a cultivated presence. Depending on whether you want to announce your arrival or blend in with a touch of class, each makes a distinct visual promise.
For runaround errands and school drops the MG ZS feels straightforward and forgiving, with ergonomics aimed at making life easier rather than thrilling; it’s uncomplicated and friendly in traffic. The Nissan Qashqai trades a bit of that raw simplicity for composed road manners and a sense of solidity on longer trips, which helps when motorway miles become routine. Both know how to carry a family, but they deliver different types of comfort — one is cheerful and light-footed, the other composed and reassuring.
Buyers of the MG ZS will talk about smart shopping and getting more car for the money, and they’ll enjoy the feeling of value without apologising for it. Owners of the Nissan Qashqai will point to a more mature cabin feel, a confident road presence and the comfort of a name with long experience in the segment. Both choices come with their own bragging rights: either savvy practicality or a quietly assured ownership story.
If what matters to you is stretching your budget while keeping everyday life uncomplicated, the MG ZS makes a persuasive case with straightforward features and a generous personality. It suits buyers who put practicality and running costs near the top of the list, commuters who want ease-of-use and families that value simplicity over flash. Expect contentment from immediate usability rather than a relentless pursuit of prestige or sportiness.
If what matters to you is a composed ride, a more polished cabin and the impression a car makes in the driveway, the Nissan Qashqai will likely resonate. It appeals to drivers who favour refinement, longer runs that benefit from composure, and tech or material touches that feel just a bit more mature. If you’re anticipating regular motorways, family trips or want to lean on brand familiarity, this is the side that feels like a considered step up; read on for the full spec-by-spec picture.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.5 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers barely more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers significantly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 182 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries marginally more – 520 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
1,625 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España