Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Elroq?
If you're in the market for a versatile SUV, the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Elroq are two contenders that demand attention. Each brings its own set of technical prowess and innovation to the table, catering to different drivers’ preferences. Let’s dive into what sets them apart and which might be your next ideal ride.
The Nissan Qashqai showcases a variety of power options with its mild hybrid (MHEV) and full hybrid engines. With outputs ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP, and torque between 240 Nm and 330 Nm, it offers a dynamic drive. Additionally, with multiple choices in transmission including a manual gearbox and CVT, and options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, the Qashqai adapts to various driving conditions. Notably, its acceleration ranges from 7.9 to 10.2 seconds from 0-100 km/h, making it versatile for urban commuting and highway driving alike.
On the other hand, the Skoda Elroq is a leap into the electric future with its fully electric powertrain. It comes with power outputs ranging from 170 HP to an impressive 286 HP. With torque reaching up to 545 Nm, and the rear-wheel drive characteristic, the Elroq not only promises eco-friendly drives but an exhilarating performance with a rapid acceleration time as low as 6.6 seconds from 0-100 km/h.
Focusing on efficiency, the Qashqai presents a fuel consumption range from 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, depending on the configuration. In contrast, the Elroq stands out with its impressive electric range, achieving anywhere between 375 km to 580 km on a full charge, complemented by a battery capacity stretching from 52 kWh to 77 kWh.
When it comes to emissions, the Qashqai’s CO2 output ranges between 116 g/km to 154 g/km, placing it predominantly in class D or E in CO2 efficiency. The Elroq, a pure-electric SUV, boasts zero tailpipe emissions, naturally granting it an A-class in CO2 efficiency.
Both SUVs cater for comfort with a seating capacity of five and a user-friendly 5-door accessibility. The Qashqai, measuring 4425 mm in length and 1835 mm in width, offers a slightly more compact feel compared to the Skoda Elroq’s 4488 mm length and 1884 mm width. Despite its electric setup, the Elroq matches the Qashqai's height at 1625 mm. Trunk capacity is another practical consideration: the Qashqai offers between 479 to 504 liters, while the Elroq provides 470 liters - sufficient for most family adventures.
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Elroq hinges largely on your driving preferences and environmental considerations. The Qashqai offers a varied powertrain lineup for the traditionalist who favors a blend of power and fuel efficiency. Meanwhile, the Elroq appeals to eco-conscious drivers enthusiastic about embracing electric innovation, offering an impressive performance and range.
In the fast-evolving automotive world, both SUVs stand out for their innovations and ability to cater to different lifestyles. Whether you choose the familiar versatility of the Qashqai or the electrifying drive of the Elroq, each models comes equipped to accompany you on unbeatable adventures.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Elroq has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29600 £. That’s a price difference of around 548 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a evident edge – offering 340 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs to a small extent better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Skoda Elroq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 349 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is noticeable lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 533 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers slight more room – 504 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 34 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq performs minimal better – up to 1580 L, which is about 133 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq slight takes the win – 531 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Skoda Elroq proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Elroq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
29100 - 45500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
377 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4488 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1884 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
470 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España