Compare performance (205 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Elroq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
If you're in the market for a versatile SUV, the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Elroq are two contenders that demand attention. Each brings its own set of technical prowess and innovation to the table, catering to different drivers’ preferences. Let’s dive into what sets them apart and which might be your next ideal ride.
The Nissan Qashqai showcases a variety of power options with its mild hybrid (MHEV) and full hybrid engines. With outputs ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP, and torque between 240 Nm and 330 Nm, it offers a dynamic drive. Additionally, with multiple choices in transmission including a manual gearbox and CVT, and options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, the Qashqai adapts to various driving conditions. Notably, its acceleration ranges from 7.9 to 10.2 seconds from 0-100 km/h, making it versatile for urban commuting and highway driving alike.
On the other hand, the Skoda Elroq is a leap into the electric future with its fully electric powertrain. It comes with power outputs ranging from 170 HP to an impressive 286 HP. With torque reaching up to 545 Nm, and the rear-wheel drive characteristic, the Elroq not only promises eco-friendly drives but an exhilarating performance with a rapid acceleration time as low as 6.6 seconds from 0-100 km/h.
Focusing on efficiency, the Qashqai presents a fuel consumption range from 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, depending on the configuration. In contrast, the Elroq stands out with its impressive electric range, achieving anywhere between 375 km to 580 km on a full charge, complemented by a battery capacity stretching from 52 kWh to 77 kWh.
When it comes to emissions, the Qashqai’s CO2 output ranges between 116 g/km to 154 g/km, placing it predominantly in class D or E in CO2 efficiency. The Elroq, a pure-electric SUV, boasts zero tailpipe emissions, naturally granting it an A-class in CO2 efficiency.
Both SUVs cater for comfort with a seating capacity of five and a user-friendly 5-door accessibility. The Qashqai, measuring 4425 mm in length and 1835 mm in width, offers a slightly more compact feel compared to the Skoda Elroq’s 4488 mm length and 1884 mm width. Despite its electric setup, the Elroq matches the Qashqai's height at 1625 mm. Trunk capacity is another practical consideration: the Qashqai offers between 479 to 504 liters, while the Elroq provides 470 liters - sufficient for most family adventures.
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Elroq hinges largely on your driving preferences and environmental considerations. The Qashqai offers a varied powertrain lineup for the traditionalist who favors a blend of power and fuel efficiency. Meanwhile, the Elroq appeals to eco-conscious drivers enthusiastic about embracing electric innovation, offering an impressive performance and range.
In the fast-evolving automotive world, both SUVs stand out for their innovations and ability to cater to different lifestyles. Whether you choose the familiar versatility of the Qashqai or the electrifying drive of the Elroq, each models comes equipped to accompany you on unbeatable adventures.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Qashqai is only slightly cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 32,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,443 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 349 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is clearly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 616 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers marginally more boot space – 504 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 34 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries very slightly more – 549 kg compared to 516 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.
details
The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 152 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
|
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
446 - 516 kg
|
Payload
482 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España