VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (205 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Kodiaq?

Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Kodiaq: Battle of the SUVs

In the ever-competitive SUV market, two contenders have consistently attracted attention with their promise of performance, innovation, and versatility. The Nissan Qashqai and the Skoda Kodiaq, both 2024 models, offer compelling cases for those in search of a reliable, modern SUV. Let's delve into the technical specs and innovations of these vehicles to see which might be the better fit for your driving needs.

Kodiaq

Design and Dimensions

The Nissan Qashqai sports dimensions that reflect its agility and urban suitability. With a length of 4425 mm, width of 1835 mm, and height of 1625 mm, it offers a compact SUV experience that's well-suited for bustling city life. The Skoda Kodiaq, on the other hand, boasts a more substantial presence. It stretches out to 4758-4761 mm in length, with a width of 1864 mm and a height of 1663-1683 mm, providing ample space for both passengers and cargo.

Qashqai

Power and Performance

The Qashqai comes with multiple engine configurations, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, delivering power outputs ranging from 140 to 190 HP. It offers a choice between manual and automatic (CVT) transmissions. The Qashqai promises a smooth ride with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 7.9 to 10.2 seconds and a fuel consumption of between 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, making it a balanced choice for efficiency and power.

In the Kodiaq, Skoda offers a varied engine selection, including plugin hybrid, petrol MHEV, diesel, and petrol. Its power spans from 150 to a robust 265 HP, with all versions sporting an automatic dual-clutch transmission. Notably, the plugin hybrid model delivers an impressive electric range of up to 123 km and a consumption of just 0.4 to 0.5 L/100km, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers. The Kodiaq accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 6.3 to 9.7 seconds.

Kodiaq

Innovations and Features

Nissan embraces cutting-edge technology in the Qashqai, providing features like advanced driver-assistance systems and a state-of-the-art infotainment setup, making every journey both safe and enjoyable. Additionally, the hybrid model offers reduced emissions, important for eco-conscious drivers.

The Kodiaq shines with its advanced tech offerings as well, featuring an impressive lineup of driver aids and connectivity options. A plugin hybrid variant highlights Skoda's commitment to sustainability, offering not only reduced emissions but also practical electric-only modes for shorter trips.

Qashqai

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to emissions, the Qashqai's CO2 output ranges from 116 to 154 g/km, categorized in classes D and E. Its hybrid technology helps reduce the overall environmental footprint. The Kodiaq, particularly in its plugin hybrid form, achieves some of the lowest CO2 emissions in the segment at 9 to 186 g/km, classified from B to G efficiency classes. This variant is a step forward in eco-friendly driving.

Kodiaq

Practicality and Capacity

The Qashqai offers a trunk capacity of 479 to 504 liters, sufficient for standard family needs or recreational gear. On the flip side, the Kodiaq impresses with its vast cargo space ranging from 745 to 910 liters, satisfying even the most demanding packing requirements for long journeys or bulky equipment.

Qashqai

The Verdict

In conclusion, both the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Kodiaq bring a unique set of attributes appealing to different types of drivers. The Qashqai stands out for its maneuverability and hybrid efficiencies, while the Kodiaq shines with its spaciousness, robust power range, and especially its eco-friendly plugin hybrid option. Your choice between these two may well come down to priorities like environmental consciousness versus space requirements and the daily demands of your driving lifestyle.

Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly perceptible cheaper
  • to a small extent lighter

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeable more power
  • decisively more efficient
  • evident quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • convincingly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Qashqai has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 3 L per 100 km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable edge – offering 265 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – reaching 226 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls a bit stronger with 400 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is to a small extent lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 406 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 658 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 563 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_005
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_001
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_011
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_032
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_022

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
29600 - 39900 £
Price
36800 - 50600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 154 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4758 mm
Width
1835 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1625 mm
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
Payload
466 - 520 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025 - 2026
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels like the classier, more refined compact crossover—crisper handling, a plush interior and sharper infotainment—while the Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible rival, offering rock-solid reliability, excellent economy and no-nonsense practicality that will age well. If you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the compact-crossover ring the Nissan Qashqai plays the reliable all‑rounder — comfortable ride, polished interior and a strong dealer network that makes it an easy, practical buy for families. The Omoda 5 is the flashy newcomer: dramatic design, generous tech kit and excellent value, but you …
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.