@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Kodiaq fits your lifestyle better.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Kodiaq: Battle of the SUVs

In the ever-competitive SUV market, two contenders have consistently attracted attention with their promise of performance, innovation, and versatility. The Nissan Qashqai and the Skoda Kodiaq, both 2024 models, offer compelling cases for those in search of a reliable, modern SUV. Let's delve into the technical specs and innovations of these vehicles to see which might be the better fit for your driving needs.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Design and Dimensions

The Nissan Qashqai sports dimensions that reflect its agility and urban suitability. With a length of 4425 mm, width of 1835 mm, and height of 1625 mm, it offers a compact SUV experience that's well-suited for bustling city life. The Skoda Kodiaq, on the other hand, boasts a more substantial presence. It stretches out to 4758-4761 mm in length, with a width of 1864 mm and a height of 1663-1683 mm, providing ample space for both passengers and cargo.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Power and Performance

The Qashqai comes with multiple engine configurations, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, delivering power outputs ranging from 140 to 190 HP. It offers a choice between manual and automatic (CVT) transmissions. The Qashqai promises a smooth ride with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 7.9 to 10.2 seconds and a fuel consumption of between 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, making it a balanced choice for efficiency and power.

In the Kodiaq, Skoda offers a varied engine selection, including plugin hybrid, petrol MHEV, diesel, and petrol. Its power spans from 150 to a robust 265 HP, with all versions sporting an automatic dual-clutch transmission. Notably, the plugin hybrid model delivers an impressive electric range of up to 123 km and a consumption of just 0.4 to 0.5 L/100km, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers. The Kodiaq accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 6.3 to 9.7 seconds.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Innovations and Features

Nissan embraces cutting-edge technology in the Qashqai, providing features like advanced driver-assistance systems and a state-of-the-art infotainment setup, making every journey both safe and enjoyable. Additionally, the hybrid model offers reduced emissions, important for eco-conscious drivers.

The Kodiaq shines with its advanced tech offerings as well, featuring an impressive lineup of driver aids and connectivity options. A plugin hybrid variant highlights Skoda's commitment to sustainability, offering not only reduced emissions but also practical electric-only modes for shorter trips.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to emissions, the Qashqai's CO2 output ranges from 116 to 154 g/km, categorized in classes D and E. Its hybrid technology helps reduce the overall environmental footprint. The Kodiaq, particularly in its plugin hybrid form, achieves some of the lowest CO2 emissions in the segment at 9 to 186 g/km, classified from B to G efficiency classes. This variant is a step forward in eco-friendly driving.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Practicality and Capacity

The Qashqai offers a trunk capacity of 479 to 504 liters, sufficient for standard family needs or recreational gear. On the flip side, the Kodiaq impresses with its vast cargo space ranging from 745 to 910 liters, satisfying even the most demanding packing requirements for long journeys or bulky equipment.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

The Verdict

In conclusion, both the Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Kodiaq bring a unique set of attributes appealing to different types of drivers. The Qashqai stands out for its maneuverability and hybrid efficiencies, while the Kodiaq shines with its spaciousness, robust power range, and especially its eco-friendly plugin hybrid option. Your choice between these two may well come down to priorities like environmental consciousness versus space requirements and the daily demands of your driving lifestyle.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Qashqai has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 7243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 4.10 L per 100 km.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable edge – offering 265 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls a bit stronger with 400 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is to a small extent lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 406 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 658 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 563 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_005 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_001 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_011 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_032 @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_022 @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_45646 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Kodiaq
Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
29600 - 39900 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
102 - 154 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1835 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1625 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
466 - 520 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLB
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their unique offerings and charm. The MG ZS delivers remarkable value with its robust features and spacious interior, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, while the Nissan Qashqai impresses with its refined driving …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the fiercely competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota RAV4 stand out for their impressive combination of space, comfort, and technology. While the Kodiaq boasts a more versatile interior with configurable seating options, the RAV4 offers a reputation for reliability and superior fuel …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.