Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (205 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Kodiaq?
Qashqai
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Qashqai has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7243 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 3 L per 100 km.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable edge – offering 265 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls a bit stronger with 400 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Qashqai
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is to a small extent lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 406 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 658 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 563 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.