Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Qashqai vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (205 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 35200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Skoda Superb Combi?
Qashqai
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Qashqai has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £ , while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 35200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5623 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Superb Combi manages with 1.20 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Combi has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 265 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Superb Combi performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Superb Combi pulls to a small extent stronger with 400 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Qashqai
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is somewhat lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1575 kg. The difference is around 155 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers noticeable more room – 690 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 186 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Superb Combi performs noticeable better – up to 1920 L, which is about 473 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Superb Combi somewhat takes the win – 584 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Combi is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £35,200
Skoda Superb Combi
Nissan Qashqai
4.9 (3 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
35200 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
1575 - 1853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
4902 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
1849 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1482 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1920 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
222 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.