Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Nissan X-Trail vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (213 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Land Rover Range Rover?
Nissan X-Trail vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
X-Trail
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan X-Trail is substantially cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 91,071 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 337 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers markedly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 275 Nm more.
X-Trail
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is significantly lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 836 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more boot space – 818 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 233 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries visibly more – 846 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 272 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £125,200
Land Rover Range Rover
Nissan X-Trail
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Nissan X-Trail
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.