In a head-to-head comparison, the Nissan X-Trail showcases its prowess as a versatile SUV, excelling in off-road capabilities and spaciousness, making it a family favorite. Meanwhile, the Renault Espace impresses with its innovative interior design and comfort, positioning itself as a premium choice for those prioritizing style and technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will largely depend on whether buyers lean towards rugged adventure or refined elegance for their journeys.
The SUV segment has gained immense popularity in recent years, with more drivers gravitating towards vehicles that offer versatility, comfort, and advanced technology. In this article, we put two compelling contenders head-to-head: the Nissan X-Trail and the Renault Espace. Both models promise a mix of innovation and performance, but who comes out on top? Let’s dive into the details.
When it comes to size, the Nissan X-Trail and Renault Espace are closely matched. The X-Trail measures at 4680 mm in length, 1840 mm in width, and 1720 mm in height, offering a robust presence on the road. In comparison, the Espace is slightly larger, featuring a length of 4722 mm, a width of 1843 mm, and a height of 1645 mm. Both vehicles come with five-door configurations, providing easy access to both front and rear seating areas.
The Nissan X-Trail boasts a range of power options, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid variants, delivering power outputs of 163 HP, 204 HP, and 213 HP. This offers impressive acceleration, with some versions achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 7 seconds. Notably, it also provides a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive.
On the other hand, the Renault Espace is equipped solely with a full hybrid engine that produces 200 HP. This SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 8.8 seconds and comes with a front-wheel drive configuration. While both models offer automatic transmissions, the X-Trail utilizes a CVT with a reduction gearbox, while the Espace features a traditional automatic gearbox.
When discussing fuel consumption, the Renault Espace clearly has the edge, with a remarkable rating of just 4.7 L/100 km compared to the X-Trail's 5.7 to 6.9 L/100 km depending on the variant. This efficiency contributes to lower CO2 emissions, with the Espace releasing only 107 g/km, while the X-Trail ranges from 131 to 161 g/km. Thus, for eco-conscious drivers, the Espace stands out as a more sustainable option.
Inside both SUVs, passengers can expect comfort and practicality. The X-Trail is known for its spaciousness, comfortably seating up to seven passengers with a trunk capacity of 575 L when all seats are in use, expanding to 585 L with all seats down. In comparison, the Renault Espace offers similar flexibility, with seating for up to seven and trunk space varying from 159 L to 581 L, depending on the configuration.
As expected from modern SUVs, both models come equipped with a plethora of advanced technology features. The Nissan X-Trail offers cutting-edge driver assistance systems, including ProPILOT, which enhances driving comfort and safety during long journeys. It also features a sophisticated infotainment system that ensures connectivity with smartphones via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
Meanwhile, the Renault Espace impresses with its extensive tech offerings, including a digital cockpit and a large touchscreen interface that provides access to various vehicle settings and infotainment options. Both models also emphasize safety, providing a suite of active and passive safety features aimed at maximizing passenger security.
In conclusion, choosing between the Nissan X-Trail and the Renault Espace ultimately depends on the individual buyer's needs and preferences. The X-Trail offers versatility in powertrains and a sporty performance edge, while the Espace shines in efficiency and low emissions. Both vehicles boast comfort, ample space, and technological innovations that cater to the contemporary SUV driver. Whether your preference leans towards practicality or performance, both models are deserving of consideration in the competitive SUV market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 33800 - 50100
£
|
Price
about 37500 - 41400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
131 - 161
g/km
|
co2
107
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961
kg
|
Curb weight
1659 - 1773
kg
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585
L
|
Trunk capacity
159 - 581
L
|
Length
4680
mm
|
Length
4722
mm
|
Width
1840
mm
|
Width
1843
mm
|
Height
1720
mm
|
Height
1645
mm
|
Payload
432 - 574
kg
|
Payload
396 - 587
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
163 - 213
HP
|
Power HP
200
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8
s
|
Max Speed
170 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
174
km/h
|
Torque
300 - 525
Nm
|
Torque
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Power kW
120 - 157
kW
|
Power kW
147
kW
|
Engine capacity
1497
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Top speed
170 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
174
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.