What drivetrain options does the Renault Espace have?

The Renault Espace is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Renault Espace?

Up to 200 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Renault Espace in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.90 L.

What is the Renault Espace’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 692 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Renault Espace?

Length 4746 mm, width 1830 mm, height 1645 mm – those are the dimensions of the Renault Espace.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.50 L.

What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 122 km on a single charge.

What is the top speed of the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq reaches up to 231 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Kodiaq overall?

Length 4758 mm, width 1864 mm, height 1679 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kodiaq.

Renault Espace vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Espace

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Renault Espace costs 37500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 694 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Espace with 4.90 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable edge – offering 265 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Renault Espace takes 8.80 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Renault Espace tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 57 km/h.

Espace

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Espace offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Renault Espace is slight lighter – 1673 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers evident more room – 910 L compared to 692 L. That’s a difference of about 218 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Espace performs barely noticeable better – up to 2224 L, which is about 119 L more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

When it comes to payload, Renault Espace hardly perceptible takes the win – 581 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Renault Espace

4.5 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq

Toyota RAV4

VS

If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …

Mazda CX-60

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …

Costs and Consumption
Price 37500 - 41400 £	Price 36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km 4.90 L	Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 110 g/km	co2 35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5 - 7	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1673 - 1783 kg	Curb weight 1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity 212 - 692 L	Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L
Length 4746 mm	Length 4758 - 4761 mm
Width 1830 mm	Width 1864 mm
Height 1645 mm	Height 1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity 2054 - 2224 L	Max trunk capacity 2105 L
Payload 404 - 581 kg	Payload 460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 HP	Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.80 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed 174 km/h	Max Speed 205 - 231 km/h
Torque -	Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 147 kW	Power kW 110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity 1199 cm3	Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3