Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Karoq – Which model is better for everyday use?
X-Trail
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Karoq has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34000 £. That’s a price difference of around 4946 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Karoq manages with 4.90 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
Karoq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail has a somewhat edge – offering 213 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs slight better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Nissan X-Trail tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan X-Trail pulls distinct stronger with 525 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm difference.
X-Trail
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is distinct lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1668 kg. The difference is around 288 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs somewhat better – up to 1630 L, which is about 206 L more than the Nissan X-Trail.
When it comes to payload, Nissan X-Trail hardly perceptible takes the win – 574 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Karoq proves to be wins by a narrow margin and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Karoq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Karoq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
Nissan X-Trail
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Skoda Karoq
5 (1 Reviews)
The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Karoq
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34000 - 50400 £
|
Price
29100 - 41700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961 kg
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
4680 mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
|
|
Width
1840 mm
|
Width
1841 mm
|
|
Height
1720 mm
|
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1396 - 1424 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Nissan X-Trail offered with different drivetrains?
The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.