VS

Omoda 5 vs Peugeot 2008 comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Peugeot 2008?

Omoda 5 vs Peugeot 2008: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

5

Omoda 5 VS Peugeot 2008: quick take for shoppers

Omoda 5 VS Peugeot 2008 pits a bold, feature-heavy newcomer against a classically finished, practical city SUV. The Omoda 5 trades on kit, safety credentials and a generous warranty to make a convincing value proposition, while the Peugeot 2008 leans on a more refined cabin and everyday practicality. For buyers this matchup boils down to show‑room impact and gadgetry versus feel‑good materials and usable space. Read on to see how those differences play out in daily life, from parking in the city to long motorway runs.

2008

Character and driving feel

The Omoda 5 presents itself as the louder personality: punchy in acceleration (especially in hybrid guise) and confident in a straight line, but its steering and chassis tuning feel soft and somewhat detached. The Peugeot 2008 is quieter in its responses and more composed through corners, sacrificing sporty feedback for predictability and comfort. Where Omoda 5 aims to impress with performance and features, Peugeot 2008 aims to reassure with steadiness and civilised manners. If you enjoy brisk on‑ramps and the sensation of brisk shove, Omoda 5 will please; if you prefer measured, undemanding handling over thrills, Peugeot 2008 will be less taxing to live with every day.

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long runs the Omoda 5 surprises with relaxed, quiet cruising when fitted with its hybrid setup, but road irregularities can expose a tendency to pitch and wobble that becomes tiresome over rough surfaces. The Peugeot 2008 settles more confidently at speed, masking wind and tyre noise better and delivering a calmer cabin for sustained motorway miles. Both cars have decent front‑seat comfort, yet Omoda 5’s rear bench feels noticeably tighter than the Peugeot 2008’s, which matters on family trips. For regular long-distance drivers who prioritise serenity, Peugeot 2008 feels more composed; Omoda 5 rewards those who value engine shove and low‑speed smoothness from its hybrid setup.

Practicality and everyday usability

When it comes to packing and day‑to‑day usefulness the Peugeot 2008 has the clearer edge: a squarer, more usable boot and thoughtful details like a split floor that make luggage and grocery runs simpler. The Omoda 5 compromises some cargo height and rear room in favour of style and a sportier silhouette, so bulky items and tall suitcases sit less comfortably. Interestingly, the Omoda 5 offers a competitive payload and robust equipment list, so it can still haul heavier loads even if its volume feels smaller. If regular family hauling and luggage practicality top your list, Peugeot 2008 fits better; if you carry heavy items infrequently and want more kit for the money, Omoda 5 remains attractive.

Cabin feel, tech and perceived quality

Step inside and the contrast is immediate: Peugeot 2008’s interior presents a more mature, premium feel with materials and styling that age well, while Omoda 5 flaunts larger screens and lots of standard equipment but reveals simpler trim and some fiddly touch menus. Both cars offer modern infotainment but the Omoda 5 buries functions behind menus and produces more nuisance warnings from driver aids, whereas the Peugeot 2008 trades some convenience for a tidier, more coherent layout. Visibility quirks appear in both — the Omoda 5’s high beltline and the Peugeot 2008’s i‑Cockpit can each demand an adjustment period — but the Peugeot’s surfaces convey quality that many buyers will notice first. If perceived refinement and material feel matter, Peugeot 2008 takes the nod; if immediate tech and headline features are your priority, Omoda 5 delivers more kit up front.

Buyer fit: who should choose which?

Choose the Omoda 5 if you want maximum equipment, a strong safety package and an appealing hybrid option that quiets the drive and trims real‑world consumption — it suits buyers focused on warranty, headline spec and urban/suburban commuting with occasional spirited runs. Opt for the Peugeot 2008 if you prioritise a composed long‑distance experience, a more usable boot for family life and an interior that feels a step above in material quality; it suits commuters who value calm refinement and practical daily usability. Neither car is aimed at the driving‑enthusiast seeking razor‑sharp feedback, but the decision here is about trade‑offs between gadgetry and perceived finish. Next up in the technical comparison we'll unpack the numbers underpinning these differences — range, real‑world efficiency, boot volumes and performance — to help you match the choice to your routine.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot 2008 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,866 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 2008 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.3 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Omoda 5 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 430 km, about 25 km more than the Peugeot 2008.

2008

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers markedly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers noticeably more torque with 340 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is markedly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,710 kg. The difference is around 447 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers moderately more boot space – 434 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries somewhat more – 536 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 89 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£31,628
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 430 km
details
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
Deciding between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 comes down to lifestyle: the 2008 is a compact crossover that prioritises higher ride height, practicality and urban versatility, while the 308 is a sharper compact hatchback focused on driving dynamics and efficiency. If you need space, …
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Citroën C3 Aircross and Peugeot 2008 are two popular small SUVs that balance city friendliness with family practicality, yet they take notably different approaches. The C3 Aircross prioritises roomy, comfort-focused interiors and clever modularity, while the 2008 leans toward sharper styling, a …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Omoda 5 and the MG 5 EV pit two different takes on compact family motoring against each other: the Omoda 5 delivers crossover styling, tech and a choice of powertrains, while the MG 5 EV is a practical, battery-electric estate focused on value and efficiency. If you favour bold design and a …
Peugeot 2008
VW Taigo
VS
The Peugeot 2008 and the VW Taigo are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly proportions with SUV styling. This comparison helps you decide whether you prefer the 2008’s bold design and character-filled interior or the Taigo’s more conventional styling, solid build and composed driving …
BYD Seal U
Omoda 5
VS
The BYD Seal U and Omoda 5 sit at different points of the market: the Seal U is a tech‑forward electric with strong range and efficiency, while the Omoda 5 is a stylish, value‑focused compact crossover. This comparison highlights real‑world driving, interior comfort, features and ownership costs so …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,600 £
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,710 kg
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Trunk capacity
350 L
Trunk capacity
434 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,770 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
536 kg
Payload
407 - 447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Peugeot
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.