Compare performance (281 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (23,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Vauxhall Mokka or Ford Puma?
The small SUV market is becoming increasingly competitive, with numerous options vying for consumer attention. Two popular choices that have emerged in recent times are the Ford Puma and the Opel Mokka. Both vehicles offer unique features, but which one comes out on top? Let's delve into a detailed comparison, focusing on technical specifications, performance, and innovative technologies.
Both the Ford Puma and Opel Mokka present sporty and modern designs that appeal to a younger demographic. The Ford Puma measures 4186 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and stands 1550 mm tall, making it slightly larger than the Mokka. In contrast, the Opel Mokka has a length of 4150 mm, a width of 1787 mm, and a height of 1535 mm. While both vehicles feature a five-door configuration and ample trunk space, the Ford Puma offers a more generous trunk capacity of 456 liters compared to the Mokka's 350 liters.
The Ford Puma is equipped with a petrol MHEV powertrain, available in several variants delivering between 125 to 160 HP. It supports both manual and automatic transmissions, excelling in fuel efficiency with consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6.0 L/100 km. The Mokka, on the other hand, offers a more diversified lineup, including petrol, petrol MHEV, and electric variants. Its power output varies from 130 to 156 HP, with a fuel consumption of 4.8 to 6.2 L/100 km, showcasing its efficiency.
Puma enthusiasts will appreciate its impressive acceleration times, with the fastest version reaching 0-100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds. This performance is competitive against the Mokka, which records a best time of 9.0 seconds for its top variant. Both vehicles achieve respectable top speeds, with the Puma reaching up to 210 km/h, while the Mokka maxes out at 207 km/h in its most powerful trim.
The Ford Puma offers a solid range of torque, with figures from 170 to 200 Nm, enhancing its driveability. The Mokka, however, takes the lead in this category, providing torque figures between 230 and 260 Nm, which makes a noticeable difference in its performance, particularly during acceleration and climbing.
In terms of emissions, the Puma emits between 121 to 136 g/km, marking it as a reasonable choice for environmentally conscious drivers. The Opel Mokka offers even better performance in this domain, with CO2 emissions as low as 108 g/km for its electric variant and between 127-139 g/km for petrol variants. This is indicative of Opel's commitment to sustainability within their lineup.
Both dealerships have incorporated advanced technology to enhance driving experiences. The Ford Puma features a robust infotainment system with infotainment features and driver-assistance technologies that streamline the driving experience. On the other hand, the Opel Mokka shines with its innovative electric drivetrain, offering an impressive electric range of 402 km with a battery capacity of 51 kWh, making it a suitable option for eco-conscious consumers.
Ultimately, the choice between the Ford Puma and the Opel Mokka depends on individual preferences and priorities. If performance and driving dynamics are your top priorities, the Ford Puma may suit you better. However, for those looking for an environmentally friendly option with comprehensive tech features, the Opel Mokka could be the ideal pick. Regardless of your choice, both SUVs represent formidable entries in the burgeoning compact SUV market, with plenty to offer drivers seeking a versatile and stylish vehicle.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Vauxhall Mokka is very slightly cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 866 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Mokka uses 4.9 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.4 kWh/100km for the Vauxhall Mokka. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers marginally more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 14 km more than the Vauxhall Mokka.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Mokka offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Mokka delivers somewhat more torque with 345 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Mokka is marginally lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
The Vauxhall Mokka is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Opel Mokka cuts a smart, modern silhouette that feels right at home in the city while still turning heads on the open road. It's a practical, easy-to-live-with crossover that blends comfy driving manners with enough flair and tech to keep daily commutes interesting — and it won’t make you regret trading up.
details
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,150 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,787 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,515 - 1,535 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,060 - 1,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
388 - 400 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 209 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España