VS

Peugeot 2008 vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Skoda Kamiq?

Peugeot 2008 vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Skoda Kamiq

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Achim Sedelmaier
2008

Peugeot 2008 and Skoda Kamiq — a practical comparison for buyers

Peugeot 2008 and Skoda Kamiq are two of the most sensible choices in the compact‑SUV aisle, and the question "Peugeot 2008 VS Skoda Kamiq" comes down to taste versus toolkit. The 2008 sells an emotional package — bold styling, a premium cabin feel and multiple electrified options — while the Kamiq trades showmanship for straightforward usability, space and low running costs. Buyers comparing the Peugeot 2008 and Skoda Kamiq are usually deciding between a design‑forward, slightly cosseting car and a no‑nonsense family workhorse. Below we walk through the real differences that matter day to day, not just on paper. This is about how each car will live in your garage and in your week, not who wins a spreadsheet contest.

Kamiq

Character and driving feel — style versus steadiness

The Peugeot 2008 feels like a small lounge on wheels: it prioritizes refinement and a composed motorway demeanor, while the Skoda Kamiq plays the pragmatic card with predictable, steady manners. In daily driving the 2008’s lighter, more refined ride lets it mask road noise and long distances feel less fatiguing, whereas the Kamiq rewards calm, economical driving and gives a reassuring, planted feel when cruising. The 2008’s steering and chassis are tuned for comfort rather than razor‑sharp feedback, and the Kamiq’s setup is similarly undramatic but more matter‑of‑fact in its responses. If you want a car that feels a touch special on the A‑road, the Peugeot 2008 leans that way; if you prefer a car that simply does the job with composure, the Skoda Kamiq is the steadier companion.

2008

Cabin feel and ergonomics — flair against functional clarity

The Peugeot 2008’s interior punches above its class with attractive materials and a modern layout, giving a genuine sense of refinement that many buyers find persuasive, while the Skoda Kamiq opts for durability and clarity with physical knobs and straightforward controls. That difference is practical: the 2008’s touchscreen‑centric climate controls and compact i‑Cockpit steering position look great but can be fiddly for some drivers, whereas the Kamiq’s tactile dials and roomy vistas make everyday operation easier and less distracting. Perceived quality favours the Peugeot 2008 — it feels more premium — but the Kamiq’s hard‑wearing surfaces and logical layout will appeal to families and commuters who value usability over polish. In short, pick the Peugeot 2008 if cabin atmosphere and design matter to you, and the Skoda Kamiq if intuitive ergonomics and long‑term practicality do.

Kamiq

Practicality and family use — luggage and rear‑seat reality

When it comes to hauling luggage and people, the Peugeot 2008 and Skoda Kamiq take different routes: the 2008 offers a roomy, well‑shaped boot and thoughtful loading details in its combustion and hybrid guises, while the Kamiq delivers exceptional rear leg‑ and headroom that makes it the better choice for taller passengers. Families will appreciate that the Kamiq’s rear seat is more generous and easier to live with day to day, but the Peugeot 2008 rewards with a more squared‑off trunk and practical floor options that simplify packing for trips. Be aware that Peugeot’s full electric option reduces boot space noticeably, which flips the equation for buyers considering an EV variant; the Kamiq keeps its luggage area consistent but can show a higher load lip unless the variable floor is specified. So for passenger comfort the Kamiq often wins, but for flexible cargo handling the Peugeot 2008 has the edge — choose based on whether people or stuff matter more in your routine.

2008

City friendliness and long‑distance behavior — compact agility versus relaxed poise

In town the Skoda Kamiq’s excellent outward visibility, light steering and compact feel make it easier to park and hustle through traffic, while the Peugeot 2008’s higher perceived refinement and lighter steering also help but occasionally require a bit more attention because of its design‑led cockpit layout. On long trips the Peugeot 2008’s quieter cabin and composed suspension deliver a more luxurious touring experience, whereas the Kamiq remains admirably economical and stable, leaning on straightforward comfort rather than cocooning silence. City drivers who value easy sightlines and simple controls will prefer the Kamiq, while those who spend lots of time on the motorway and prize interior serenity will be drawn to the 2008. Each car plays to different strengths across urban and long‑distance use — the trade‑off is visibility and simplicity versus cabin calm.

Kamiq

Buyer fit and trade‑offs — which one to consider before the spec sheet

If you’re choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and Skoda Kamiq the decision narrows to priorities: the 2008 suits buyers who want a stylish, premium‑feeling small SUV with quiet motorway manners and — if you choose it — electrified options, whereas the Kamiq suits shoppers who prize rear‑seat space, straightforward controls and lower running costs. Budget‑minded buyers and families who regularly carry adult passengers tend to prefer the Kamiq’s usable interior and sensible features, while design‑conscious buyers who value cabin quality and a more refined highway experience will gravitate toward the Peugeot 2008. These differences shape what you’ll notice every week, from school runs to road trips, so consider which compromises you can live with before diving into numbers. If you want the technical trade‑offs that explain those everyday effects, the detailed comparison that follows will make the practical consequences clear without hiding behind raw specs.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kamiq is slightly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Peugeot 2008 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,494 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 2008 uses 4.9 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 2008 offers very slightly more power – delivering 156 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 2008 delivers only slightly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

2008

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is very slightly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,263 kg. The difference is around 32 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers only slightly more boot space – 434 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 34 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries somewhat more – 539 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 92 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 2008 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
2008

Peugeot 2008

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manual
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 101 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 405 km
details
Peugeot 2008
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Prosper
26 Jun 2026, 17:36:12

This review applies to the GT version; cheap glossy plastics in the interior, lack of physical, dedicated climate/vent controls, narrow trunk width. On the plus side, excellent suspension that soaks up all the bumps, especially on gravel roads.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

4.8 (8 Reviews)
rate
Калин
3 Sept 2026, 19:16:45

Имам я от 4 месеца и нямам забележки

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Raphael
14 Aug 2026, 13:38:47

A great car. I’ve now been driving it for 20,000 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Reg
19 Jul 2026, 13:56:09

Roomy nice ride well made reliable very good value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want compact, city-friendly practicality or a more modern, feature-focused package. This brief comparison highlights the key differences in space, efficiency, tech and driving character so you can decide which suits your …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
Deciding between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 comes down to lifestyle: the 2008 is a compact crossover that prioritises higher ride height, practicality and urban versatility, while the 308 is a sharper compact hatchback focused on driving dynamics and efficiency. If you need space, …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Ateca leans toward a roomier, more driver-focused experience while the Kamiq prioritizes city-friendly practicality and efficiency. This comparison will focus on space, driving dynamics, equipment and …
Opel Mokka
Peugeot 2008
VS
Opel Mokka brings punchy engines, chunky SUV looks and a practical, straightforward cabin that’s easy to live with — ideal if you want fuss-free value and a touch of rugged charm. The Peugeot 2008 bets on style and tech, with a striking interior, nimble handling and the addictive i‑Cockpit layout, …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and Skoda Karoq are compact SUVs from the same family but aimed at different buyers: the Kamiq is city-friendly and efficient, while the Karoq offers more space, capability and refinement. This short comparison will help you decide whether the Kamiq’s nimble practicality or the …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Golf
VS
Skoda Kamiq vs VW Golf — two compact choices from the Volkswagen Group that answer different needs: the Kamiq is a practical, raised small SUV and the Golf is the benchmark compact hatchback. Below I compare how they stack up on space, driving, technology, running costs and which buyer each suits …
Peugeot 2008
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
405 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
434 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,770 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
407 - 447 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 2008?

The Peugeot 2008 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.