VS

Polestar 4 vs ZEEKR 7X – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Polestar 4 or ZEEKR 7X?

Polestar 4 vs ZEEKR 7X: An Electrifying Showdown

The electric SUV market is heating up with bold new entries vying for dominance. Among the standout players are the Polestar 4 and the ZEEKR 7X, both designed to offer leading-edge performance wrapped in futuristic styling. Let's delve into the technical prowess and innovative features that each of these electric powerhouses brings to the road.

Performance and Power

The Polestar 4 offers a versatile driving setup with both all-wheel drive (AWD) and rear-wheel drive (RWD) options. It delivers between 272 HP and a striking 544 HP, with torque levels at 343 Nm and 686 Nm respectively, providing a rapid acceleration potential. Impressively, its AWD variant can go from 0-100 km/h in just 3.8 seconds, a testament to its potent powertrain.

The ZEEKR 7X, on the other hand, makes a compelling case with its RWD and AWD configurations, offering between 422 HP and a robust 639 HP. It rivals the Polestar in acceleration, with its AWD version also hitting the 0-100 km/h mark in 3.8 seconds. Its torque ranges from 440 Nm to an impressive 710 Nm, indicating strong performance dynamics and a slightly faster max speed of 210 km/h.

Efficiency and Range

Efficiency is a crucial aspect for electric SUVs, and here the Polestar 4 stands out with its consumption figures ranging from 17.8 to 18.7 kWh/100km, offering a substantial electric range between 590 km and 620 km. This positions it as an attractive option for those prioritizing long-distance travel.

Conversely, the ZEEKR 7X showcases a consumption range of 17.7 to 19.9 kWh/100km, coupled with a somewhat limited, yet competitive electric range of 480 km to 615 km. While slightly trailing in overall efficiency, the 7X still promises sufficient range to appease daily commuters and weekend adventurers alike.

Design and Dimensions

Dimensionally, both competitors offer robust and distinct SUV designs. The Polestar 4 measures 4840 mm in length, 2008 mm in width, and 1534 mm in height, creating a sleek and low-slung profile. Its trunk capacity of 526 L ensures ample cargo space, combining form with functionality.

The ZEEKR 7X is a tad more compact with a length of 4787 mm, a width of 1930 mm, and a height of 1650 mm, giving it a more elevated stance. It edges out the Polestar slightly in trunk capacity with 539 L, emphasizing practicality alongside its stylish exterior.

Technological Innovation

In the realm of technological advancements, both vehicles stand at the forefront of innovation. Both the Polestar 4 and ZEEKR 7X come with an array of state-of-the-art driver-assistance features and connectivity options designed to enhance the driving experience. Their intuitive infotainment systems and premium materials underscore a commitment to luxury and user-friendly technology.

Concluding Thoughts

Choosing between the Polestar 4 and the ZEEKR 7X boils down to specific needs and preferences. The Polestar 4 is ideal for those seeking superior range and a slightly more efficient drive. In contrast, the ZEEKR 7X caters well to those favoring a higher power output and a marginally higher top speed. Both vehicles, however, represent the future of automotive technology and performance, offering compelling choices in the burgeoning electric SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

ZEEKR 7X has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 45400 £, while the Polestar 4 costs 53100 £. That’s a price difference of around 7637 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the ZEEKR 7X: with 17.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Polestar 4 with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.

As for range, the Polestar 4 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 620 km, about 5 km more than the ZEEKR 7X.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the ZEEKR 7X has a to a small extent edge – offering 646 HP compared to 544 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 3.80 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the ZEEKR 7X performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Polestar 4 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the ZEEKR 7X pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 710 Nm compared to 686 Nm. That’s about 24 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, the Polestar 4 is minimal lighter – 2230 kg compared to 2395 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.

In terms of boot space, the ZEEKR 7X offers barely noticeable more room – 539 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.

When it comes to payload, ZEEKR 7X barely noticeable takes the win – 485 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Our conclusion: The ZEEKR 7X proves to be offers a more balanced package and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, ZEEKR 7X is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 embodies a seamless blend of cutting-edge technology and sophisticated design, establishing itself as a prominent contender in the modern electric vehicle market. Its elegant exterior lines are complemented by an interior that prioritises both luxury and sustainability, offering a serene driving experience. With its focus on innovation, the Polestar 4 continues to push the boundaries of performance, setting a new standard for what an electric car can achieve.

details

ZEEKR 7X

The ZEEKR 7X is a striking entry into the electric vehicle market, blending sleek aesthetics with a promise of cutting-edge technology. Its design exudes modern luxury while offering advanced features tailored for tech-savvy drivers. Positioned as a competitor in the premium electric segment, the 7X aims to deliver a dynamic driving experience alongside eco-friendly credentials.

details
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7X
4

Costs and Consumption

Price
53100 - 59900 £
Price
45400 - 54000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 19.9 kWh
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Electric Range
480 - 615 km
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2230 - 2355 kg
Curb weight
2395 - 2535 kg
Trunk capacity
526 L
Trunk capacity
539 L
Length
4840 mm
Length
4787 mm
Width
2008 mm
Width
1930 mm
Height
1534 mm
Height
1650 mm
Max trunk capacity
1536 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 kg
Payload
455 - 485 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Power HP
421 - 646 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
210 km/h
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Torque
440 - 710 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Power kW
310 - 475 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Polestar
Brand
ZEEKR
Is the Polestar 4 offered with different drivetrains?

The Polestar 4 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.