VS

Renault Arkana vs Fiat Panda comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 70 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 14,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Fiat Panda?

Renault Arkana vs Fiat Panda: Key differences

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

Fiat Panda

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Fiat Panda is clearly cheaper – starting at 14,100 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,323 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Fiat Panda with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Panda

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers considerably more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Arkana is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 10.8 s, while the Fiat Panda takes 13.9 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Arkana delivers considerably more torque with 205 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 113 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Panda is clearly lighter – 1,055 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 455 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries moderately more – 451 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Fiat Panda
Fiat Pandina
VS
Fiat Panda vs Fiat Pandina: the no-nonsense city icon faces its chic, safety-boosted sibling. The Pandina sprinkles extra ADAS, fresher trim and playful details onto the same thrifty, park-anywhere package—so unless you crave the added kit and flair, the regular Panda keeps more coins in your …
Fiat 500
Fiat Panda
VS
The Fiat 500 is a cheeky, retro-styled city charmer that wraps bright personality and nimble handling into a compact package ideal for urban life. By contrast, the Fiat Panda trades glamour for practicality — roomier, tougher on rough roads and far more usable for families or weekend escapes, so …
Renault Arkana
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Fiat Panda

The Panda is a charming, no-nonsense city companion that mixes cheerful Italian flair with genuinely useful practicality, making tight streets and daily errands feel less of a chore. Its honest simplicity, clever packaging and a dash of cheeky character make it a smart, low-stress buy for people who prefer sensible perks over showroom flash.

details
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_333
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_157
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_304
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_049

Reviews Fiat Panda

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Fiat Panda
Hyundai i10
VS
In the realm of city cars, the Fiat Panda and Hyundai i10 stand out for their practicality and compact design. The Panda offers a versatile interior and a slightly more rugged aesthetic, making it ideal for urban adventures, while the i10 delivers a peppy driving experience and advanced tech …
Fiat Panda
Peugeot 208
VS
In the battle of compacts, the Fiat Panda stands out for its practicality and budget-friendly operation, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking simplicity and reliability. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 208 offers a more refined ride with its sleek design and advanced technology, appealing to …
Fiat Panda
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the world of compact cars, the Fiat Panda and the Suzuki Swift both bring unique strengths to the table. The Fiat Panda excels with its practical and spacious interior, making it a champion of urban maneuverability and efficiency. On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift offers a peppier driving …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Fiat Panda
Suzuki Ignis
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Fiat Panda and Suzuki Ignis each carve out distinct niches for urban drivers. The Fiat Panda impresses with its no-nonsense approach, yielding a surprisingly spacious interior and a user-friendly experience ideal for city commutes. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Ignis …
Fiat Panda
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Unsure whether the Fiat Panda or the Fiat Grande Panda is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Arkana
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
14,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
113 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
38 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,055 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
225 L
Length
-
Length
3,635 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,643 mm
Height
-
Height
1,551 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
870 L
Payload
451 kg
Payload
365 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
70 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
164 km/h
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
92 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
51 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Renault
Brand
Fiat
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.