VS

Renault Arkana vs Ford Kuga comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Ford Kuga?

Renault Arkana vs Ford Kuga: Key differences

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Arkana

Ford Kuga vs. Renault Arkana: A Compelling SUV Showdown

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, two contenders have emerged that marry style, practicality, and technology: the 2024 Ford Kuga and the 2023-2024 Renault Arkana. While both vehicles fall under the SUV category, they bring unique characteristics and innovations to the table, especially in terms of engine variety, drivetrain options, and performance metrics. This comparison delves deeper into what makes each of these models a compelling choice for prospective buyers.

Kuga

Engine Options and Performance Capabilities

The Ford Kuga offers a versatile engine lineup, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Whether you're interested in a manual gearbox or the smooth transitions of a CVT, the Kuga covers both bases. The power output ranges from 150 to an impressive 243 HP, with a top speed stretching up to 200 km/h and acceleration times from 9.5 to a nimble 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Additionally, the Kuga's plug-in hybrid model boasts an electric range of up to 69 km, highlighting its emphasis on efficiency.

On the other hand, the Renault Arkana emphasizes a hybrid approach too, offering full hybrid and mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) gasoline engines. Producing between 140 and 158 HP, and reaching top speeds of up to 174 km/h, the Arkana provides a dynamic drive. Accelerating from 0-100 km/h between 10.8 to 9.1 seconds, it might not match the rapid acceleration of some Kuga models but offers a balanced performance suitable for city and highway driving.

Arkana

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Considerations

Efficiency is where both vehicles strive to impress. The Ford Kuga shines with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km in its plug-in hybrid form, backed by a CO2 efficiency class from E to B depending on the model configuration. This makes it an attractive option for environmentally-conscious consumers looking to minimize their carbon footprint.

The Arkana does not trail far behind, with an impressive 4.7 L/100km consumption in its full hybrid variant and CO2 outputs ranging from 106 to 135 g/km. Positioned with CO2 efficiency classes from C to D, the Arkana showcases Renault's commitment to sustainable yet functional vehicles.

Kuga

Design and Practicality

Design plays a crucial role in the buying decision, and both the Kuga and Arkana have an edge in aesthetics with their sleek lines and robust presence. The Ford Kuga spans a length between 4604 to 4645 mm, with a roomy width of 1882 mm and height up to 1681 mm. Its trunk capacity of 412 liters may appear limiting, yet its payload capacity compensates for various transport needs.

The Renault Arkana stands slightly shorter in both length (4568 mm) and height (1576 mm) but boasts a larger trunk volume of up to 513 liters, appealing to those requiring greater cargo space. Its more slender body width of 1821 mm offers a streamlined appearance, making it agile in urban settings.

Arkana

Choosing Between the Two: A Matter of Preference

Deciding between the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana ultimately depends on personal preferences and driving needs. The Kuga is versatile with a broad engine range and superior hybrid efficiency, ideal for those valuing electric range and power. Meanwhile, the Arkana provides a compelling crossover experience with its efficient design and ample trunk space — appealing to practical yet style-conscious buyers.

Both SUVs embody the advancements in automotive engineering and offer considerable benefits. The choice depends largely on whether hybrid efficiency or a stylish, practical design ranks highest on your new car checklist.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,785 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

Kuga

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers considerably more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Kuga delivers a bit more torque with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is marginally lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries moderately more – 550 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 68 km
details
Renault Arkana
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Ford Capri
VS
The Ford Kuga is the modern, family-ready compact SUV — sensible, tech-savvy and built for school runs, weekend getaways and minimal fuss. The Ford Capri is the cheeky classic coupe: a slice of retro charisma and driver-focused flair that trades boot space and back seats for pure personality.
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
In a clash of electrified titans, the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga vie for supremacy in the competitive SUV segment. The BYD Seal U impresses with its futuristic design and cutting-edge electric powertrains, making it a standout for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Ford Kuga offers a balanced …
Renault Arkana
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
68 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
55 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
541 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Ford
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.