VS

Renault Arkana vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Hyundai Kona?

Renault Arkana vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
details

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • barely more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai Kona is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,886 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers noticeably more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers noticeably more torque with 265 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is moderately lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 140 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries barely more – 490 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Arkana
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
Paul Corkish
8 Jun 2026, 11:47:29

About to buy my new 3rd Kona (2nd N line Hybrid)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV2
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV2, two compact crossovers that aim to deliver efficient electric driving with practical everyday usability. I’ll compare the essentials—range, charging, interior space, driving feel and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Škoda Elroq are close rivals in the small-to-compact SUV segment — this quick comparison will help you spot the practical differences that matter. The Kona is a nimble, tech-rich option with multiple powertrain choices (including electric), while the Elroq prioritizes …
Hyundai i20
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai i20 and the Hyundai Kona occupy different roles in the small-car segment: the i20 is a compact, efficient hatchback while the Kona is a taller, more versatile compact crossover. This comparison will focus on their size, driving dynamics, practicality and running costs so you can quickly …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different visions of mobility: the Kona is a compact, practical crossover you can buy today, while the Symbioz is Renault’s futuristic concept car showcasing autonomous, connected electric technologies. If you want an affordable, …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Renault Arkana
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Hyundai
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.