VS

Renault Arkana vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Mazda CX-5?

Renault Arkana vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • marginally lighter
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Arkana is very slightly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,534 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Arkana offers only slightly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-5 delivers somewhat more torque with 238 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 33 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is marginally lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 119 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries markedly more – 601 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Renault Arkana
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Renault Arkana
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
-
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
451 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Renault
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.