Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Toyota bZ4X comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Toyota bZ4X?
Renault Arkana vs Toyota bZ4X: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana is noticeably cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Toyota bZ4X costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,391 £.
bZ4X
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota bZ4X offers considerably more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 237 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota bZ4X delivers clearly more torque with 338 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 133 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is markedly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 390 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota bZ4X carries clearly more – 565 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota bZ4X holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Toyota bZ4X
Renault Arkana
Toyota bZ4X
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a fresh, roomy electric crossover that pairs Toyota’s trademark reliability with bold, angular styling and a cabin designed for everyday comfort. It may not chase headlines like some flashier rivals, but for buyers who want sensible electric motoring with practical packaging and a relaxed, confident ride, it’s an easy, pleasant choice.
details
Renault Arkana
Toyota bZ4X
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
36,800 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
444 - 591 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,180 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
375 - 565 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 380 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 280 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.