What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Renault Arkana?

Up to 143 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Renault Arkana use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.70 L.

How many kWh does the Renault Arkana’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 0.60 kWh.

What are the Renault Arkana’s length, width and height?

Length 4568 mm, width 1821 mm, height 1576 mm – those are the dimensions of the Renault Arkana.

What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

What maximum speed does the Volvo XC40 reach?

The Volvo XC40 reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC40’s length, width and height?

The Volvo XC40 measures 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide and 1652 mm high.

Renault Arkana vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Arkana has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 8305 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a noticeable edge – offering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC40 performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls evident stronger with 300 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Arkana is somewhat lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 178 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers minimal more room – 480 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs minimal better – up to 1328 L, which is about 65 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 to a small extent takes the win – 532 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo XC40 proves to be offers a more balanced package and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC40 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai

Volvo XC40

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Renault Arkana

Renault Symbioz

VS

The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …

Costs and Consumption
Price 28500 - 31900 £	Price 36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km 4.70 L	Consumption L/100km 6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 0.60 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 106 g/km	co2 147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1510 kg	Curb weight 1688 kg
Trunk capacity 480 L	Trunk capacity 452 L
Length 4568 mm	Length 4425 mm
Width 1821 mm	Width 1863 mm
Height 1576 mm	Height 1652 mm
Max trunk capacity 1263 L	Max trunk capacity 1328 L
Payload 451 kg	Payload 532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 143 HP	Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.80 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed 172 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 205 Nm	Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 105 kW	Power kW 120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3