Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (143 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (28500 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Volvo XC40?
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8305 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.
XC40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a noticeable edge – offering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC40 performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls evident stronger with 300 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is somewhat lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 178 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers minimal more room – 480 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs minimal better – up to 1328 L, which is about 65 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 to a small extent takes the win – 532 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC40 comes out ahead with a more balanced overall result in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Renault Arkana
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Volvo XC40
Renault Arkana
3.8 (5 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Volvo XC40
5 (4 Reviews)
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Renault Arkana
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
Price
36800 - 47200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
Curb weight
1688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4568 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1821 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1576 mm
|
Height
1652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?
The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.