VS

Renault Captur vs SsangYong Musso comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 28,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or SsangYong Musso?

Renault Captur vs SsangYong Musso: Key differences

Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

SsangYong Musso

  • markedly more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Captur

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Captur is markedly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the SsangYong Musso costs 28,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,320 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the SsangYong Musso with 8.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.

Captur

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Musso offers markedly more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Musso delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.

Captur

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is considerably lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 722 kg.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries considerably more – 1,010 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 557 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Captur stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Renault Captur and Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, practicality and efficient powertrains. The Captur leans on bold design and flexible interior space, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes hybrid efficiency, Toyota’s …
Renault Captur
SsangYong Musso

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Lüsi
15 May 2026, 16:11:37

More affordable, high-level infotainment and better quality — good value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

SsangYong Musso

The Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.

details

Reviews SsangYong Musso

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
Renault Captur
VW T-Roc
VS
The Renault Captur and the VW T‑Roc are two popular compact crossovers that combine agile urban sizing with SUV styling, yet they differ in driving feel, interior quality and practicality. This quick comparison highlights the key strengths and trade-offs to help you choose the better fit for …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
Jeep Avenger
Renault Captur
VS
Short, practical comparison of the Jeep Avenger and the Renault Captur to help you pick the right small crossover for daily driving. The Avenger is Jeep’s compact, electric-minded SUV with rugged styling and straightforward EV simplicity, while the Captur is a versatile, well-rounded urban …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Sandero and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritise affordable, no-nonsense practicality or a more refined, crossover-style package with extra equipment. The Sandero delivers exceptional value and low running costs, while the Captur offers more comfort, …
Renault Captur
Renault Mégane
VS
Small, raised and city-savvy, the Renault Captur is the compact crossover for shoppers who want higher seating, flexible space and an easygoing ride; the Renault Mégane, by contrast, is a sharper hatch that rewards drivers with crisper handling and a more planted feel. If your life is school runs …
Renault Captur
SsangYong Musso

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 28,600 £
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
221 - 245 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
75 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,950 mm
Height
-
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
447 - 453 kg
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Torque
400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
149 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Renault
Brand
SsangYong
What drivetrain options does the Renault Captur have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.