VS

Renault Clio vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Hyundai Kona?

Renault Clio vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • a bit lighter

Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Clio is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Renault Clio is very slightly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Hyundai Kona tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers clearly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is a bit lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 168 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more boot space – 466 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 139 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,300 L, about 124 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
Renault Clio
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
Renault Clio
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption

Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
co2
92 - 115 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4,116 mm
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
Brand
Renault
Brand
Hyundai
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.