VS

Renault Clio vs Peugeot 208 comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 21,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Peugeot 208?

Renault Clio vs Peugeot 208: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • very slightly more efficient

Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Clio

Power and Performance: Under the Hood

The Peugeot 208 offers a diverse range of engine types to cater to different driving preferences, including petrol, electric, and petrol MHEV options. With power outputs ranging from 101 HP to 156 HP, the 208 provides versatility for both urban and highway driving. The torque specs fluctuate between 205 Nm and 270 Nm, ensuring a responsive driving experience.

In contrast, the Renault Clio focuses more on hybrid and petrol engines. Offering power outputs of 67 HP to 143 HP, the Clio caters to drivers looking for efficiency with its full hybrid option. The Clio's torque ranges from 95 Nm to 205 Nm, which provides adequate power for standard driving conditions.

208

Speed and Acceleration: Going from 0 to 100km/h

The Peugeot 208 showcases an impressive range of acceleration figures, with the fastest model reaching 0-100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds. It also boasts a top speed of up to 200 km/h, providing excitement for thrill-seekers.

The Renault Clio, while more modest in its speed offerings, still delivers solid performance with its hybrid model achieving 0-100 km/h in 9.3 seconds and a maximum speed of 174 km/h. These figures make the Clio suitable for those prioritizing efficiency over raw speed.

Clio

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel economy, the Peugeot 208 delivers impressive consumption numbers, with the electric variant consuming as low as 14.1 kWh/100km and petrol options offering around 4.5 to 5.2 L/100km. The CO2 emissions vary significantly, with electric models having a clear zero emissions rating.

The Renault Clio, focusing heavily on hybrid technology, provides a low consumption rate of 4.3 L/100km for its hybrid engine. This makes it a very eco-friendly option and aligns with drivers looking to reduce their carbon footprint.

208

Interior and Cargo Space

Both the Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Peugeot 208 offers slightly more trunk capacity at 352 litres, compared to the Clio’s range between 301 and 391 litres, depending on the configuration.

The dimensions of the vehicles offer interesting points of comparison, with the 208 measuring 4055 mm in length, while the Clio is slightly more compact at 4053 mm. The width of the Clio is more substantial than the 208, providing a roominess advantage for occupants.

Clio

Innovations and Technological Advancements

The Peugeot 208 integrates cutting-edge engineering, with electric models providing a range of up to 432 km on a single charge, thanks to their 51 kWh battery capacity. The inclusion of MHEV variants demonstrates Peugeot's commitment to embracing hybrid technology.

Renault’s Clio showcases its innovation through its full hybrid technology, a major highlight for eco-conscious drivers. The Clio's smaller 0.6 kWh battery aids in efficiency improvements without the weight penalty of a larger battery, keeping the vehicle nimble and economical.

208

Conclusion: Choosing Your Ideal Hatchback

In the battle of the hatchbacks, both the Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio present strong cases. The 208 stands out with its variety of powertrains, including a compelling electric model for the environmentally conscious. Meanwhile, the Clio’s strength lies in its hybrid technology, providing an optimal mix of economy and performance.

Ultimately, your choice may boil down to what you prioritize more: the diverse offerings and electric innovation of the Peugeot 208, or the hybrid sophistication of the Renault Clio. Either way, both vehicles promise an engaging driving experience in a compact, stylish package.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is visibly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Peugeot 208 costs 21,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,925 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Peugeot 208 with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

208

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers only slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.3 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

Looking at top speed, the Peugeot 208 is marginally faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 208 delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 208 is very slightly lighter – 1,165 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 37 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 208 offers barely more boot space – 352 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,176 L, about 13 L more than the Peugeot 208.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries very slightly more – 463 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 208 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,000
208

Peugeot 208

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 362 - 432 km
Renault Clio
Peugeot 208

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details

Peugeot 208

The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.

details
Renault Clio
Peugeot 208

Costs and Consumption

Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
21,000 - 35,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
362 - 432 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
co2
92 - 115 g/km
co2
0 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
44 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
1,165 - 1,530 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
Length
4,116 mm
Length
4,055 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,745 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Height
1,430 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Max trunk capacity
1,118 - 1,163 L
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
380 - 430 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General

Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
Brand
Renault
Brand
Peugeot
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.