VS

Renault Clio vs Peugeot 208 comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 21,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Peugeot 208?

Renault Clio vs Peugeot 208: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
details

Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Clio

Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio: a focused comparison

The Peugeot 208 and the Renault Clio sit at the heart of the small‑car battleground, and this comparison looks at how each answers the everyday questions buyers actually care about. In the duel between Peugeot 208 VS Renault Clio you’ll see two distinct approaches: the 208 trades on style, perceived quality and a compact, city‑savvy driving character, while the Clio emphasises everyday practicality, very low running costs and a tech‑forward cabin. This piece cuts through brochures to focus on character, comfort, practicality, cabin feel, long‑distance behaviour and urban usability rather than headline specs. Expect concrete trade‑offs: some buyers will prefer the Peugeot 208’s poise and finish, others the Renault Clio’s pragmatic efficiency and space.

208

Character and driving feel

Drive character is where the two diverge: the Peugeot 208 feels stylish and agile, with a compact, light steering and a setup that rewards urban manoeuvres. The Renault Clio, by contrast, projects a calmer, more grown‑up demeanour — its ride and steering prioritise stability and composure at speed rather than snappy turn‑in. That difference shows up in everyday use: the 208 is quicker to hustle through traffic and more rewarding in tight corners, while the Clio is the one you’ll trust for relaxed motorway runs and long days behind the wheel. Under load the Peugeot often delivers a more immediate shove, whereas the Clio’s drivetrain choices aim to keep consumption low even if they feel more conservative.

Clio

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On longer trips the picture changes: the Renault Clio tends to feel more settled and forgiving over distance, with a suspension tune that smooths out country roads without losing composure. The Peugeot 208 can be impressively hushed on the motorway for its size, yet it often rides firmer over broken surfaces, especially with larger wheels. Front‑seat comfort is a strength in both cars, but the 208’s cabin finishes give it a more premium atmosphere while the Clio trades some of that finesse for broader cushioning and composure. If you regularly carry adults in the rear or need real luggage flexibility, the Clio’s packaging will feel more grown‑up than the 208’s cosy two‑up focus.

208

City friendliness and everyday usability

In town the Peugeot 208’s compact footprint, small steering wheel and tight turning feel make parking and lane‑weaving genuinely easy and even pleasant. The Renault Clio is no slouch in urban life, but its strengths are more pragmatic: the hybrid’s ability to run electrically in stop‑start traffic and a straightforward layout make daily chores cheaper and simpler. Practical usability highlights the trade‑off: the Clio offers more outright cargo flexibility in its conventional petrol forms and triple Isofix options, while the 208’s boot and rear room are more limited and geared to two‑person life. Buyers who prioritise nimbleness and a nicer cabin for short trips will lean to the Peugeot 208, whereas those wanting lower running costs and family readiness will favour the Renault Clio.

Clio

Cabin feel, perceived quality and infotainment

Step inside and the contrast becomes tactile: the Peugeot 208 insists on a premium feel, with richer materials and a distinct cockpit layout that reads upmarket for the segment. The Renault Clio counters with a cleaner, more functional interior and a modern, Google‑based infotainment that simply works and updates over the air. That means the 208 wins on perceived quality and atmosphere, but the Clio frequently wins the daily usability battle because its infotainment is faster and core controls remain easier to use without hunting through menus. If you value a luxurious cabin vibe and are willing to live with a polarising control layout, the Peugeot 208 plays to your tastes; if you want instant, reliable tech and straightforward ergonomics, the Renault Clio is the sharper household tool.

208

Buyer fit and the practical trade‑offs that follow

Choosing between the Peugeot 208 and the Renault Clio comes down to priorities: pick the 208 if you prize style, a more premium cabin and an engaging city character, and pick the Clio if you prioritise low running costs, tech convenience and practical space. Families or anyone needing sensible luggage space and easy‑to‑use tech will find the Renault Clio a more forgiving daily companion, while singles or couples who value road presence and cabin quality will appreciate the Peugeot 208. Both have compromises — the 208’s tighter rear room and optionised extras versus the Clio’s high boot sill and hybrid packaging — and those trade‑offs are exactly what the technical comparison that follows will pin down. Read on to see how those real‑world differences map to driving dynamics, packaging and running costs so you can decide which set of compromises matches your life.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 208
Peugeot 308
VS
The Peugeot 208 is the cheeky city slicker — nimble, economical and perfect for tight streets and short trips — while the Peugeot 308 is the grown-up hatchback, offering more space, refinement and motorway composure. Pick the 208 for lively, budget-friendly urban driving; choose the 308 if you need …
Kia Picanto
Renault Clio
VS
The Kia Picanto and Renault Clio are popular choices in the small-car market, but they suit different needs: the Picanto excels as an ultra-compact, easy-to-park city car with strong value, while the Clio offers more space, refinement and equipment for everyday family use. If you prioritise low …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is visibly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Peugeot 208 costs 21,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,925 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Peugeot 208 with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

208

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers only slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.3 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 208 delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 208 is very slightly lighter – 1,165 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 37 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 208 offers barely more boot space – 352 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries very slightly more – 463 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 208 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,000
208

Peugeot 208

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 101 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 363 - 432 km
details
Renault Clio
Peugeot 208

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot 208

The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.

details
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP105
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP103
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP018
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP_300

Reviews Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Labbe
21 Dec 2025, 15:16:45

Fuel consumption stated in the article — misleading. In town, on the highway, at least 7 L/100 km.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 208
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 208 and the SEAT Ibiza means weighing French flair and cutting-edge interior tech against Spanish practicality and strong value in the small-car class. Below I’ll compare driving feel, interior quality, running costs and everyday usability so you can pick the one that …
Peugeot 208
Toyota Aygo
VS
Comparing the Peugeot 208 and the Toyota Aygo helps buyers choose between a more accomplished supermini and a tiny, city-focused hatchback. The 208 offers richer interior quality, more space and punchier engines, while the Aygo trades performance and equipment for lower running costs, easier …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
The Renault Clio and VW Polo are two of Europe's best-selling superminis, each offering smart styling, efficient engines and practical interiors. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior space, running costs and tech to help you pick which small car suits you best.
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Fiat Panda
Peugeot 208
VS
The Fiat Panda and Peugeot 208 are two popular small hatchbacks that approach city driving very differently: the Panda emphasizes practicality, simplicity and surprising interior space, while the 208 prioritises style, refinement and modern tech. Choose the Panda for low running costs, rugged …
Renault Clio
Peugeot 208

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
21,000 - 33,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
363 - 432 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 118 g/km
co2
0 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
1,165 - 1,530 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,745 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
380 - 430 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Renault
Brand
Peugeot
What drivetrain options does the Renault Clio have?

The Renault Clio is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.