VS

SEAT Ateca vs Maserati Quattroporte comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 430 HP), boot space and price (25,100 £ vs 147,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SEAT Ateca or Maserati Quattroporte?

SEAT Ateca vs Maserati Quattroporte: Key differences

SEAT Ateca

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Maserati Quattroporte

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SEAT Ateca is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,100 £ , while the Maserati Quattroporte costs 147,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 122,381 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Ateca uses 4.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Maserati Quattroporte with 11.1 L/100km. The difference is about 6.2 L/100km.

Quattroporte

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Maserati Quattroporte offers clearly more power – delivering 430 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 280 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Maserati Quattroporte is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Maserati Quattroporte delivers noticeably more torque with 580 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.

Ateca

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Ateca is considerably lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 2,055 kg. The difference is around 710 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Maserati Quattroporte offers barely more boot space – 530 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Ateca carries barely more – 525 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The SEAT Ateca holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,100
Ateca

SEAT Ateca

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
Hyundai Tucson
SEAT Ateca
VS
As compact SUVs that balance practicality and value, the Hyundai Tucson and SEAT Ateca are popular choices for buyers seeking everyday comfort with sensible running costs. This comparison cuts through the specs to show which model — the Tucson or the Ateca — suits your needs better, whether you …
SEAT Ateca
Maserati Quattroporte

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SEAT Ateca

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ
SEAT-Ateca_012
SEAT-Ateca_011
SEAT-Ateca_006
SEAT-Ateca_004

Reviews SEAT Ateca

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
editor
1 Jul 2026, 17:23:30

Exactly the right size. Just still suitable for families. The touchscreen is nicely integrated, not just a tablet stuck on — it flows into a console with the Virtual Cockpit and still has real buttons for the most important everyday functions. Perfect mix. My comparisons were the new 2er Active Tourer, the B‑Class and the Kia Sportage. The Ateca won for me overall by a clear margin, but it was a bit overpriced in comparison. And it wasn't my dream car. More a "practical car." Cheap is a thing of the past.

The speedo shows up to 218 km/h, but it really struggles to get beyond about 180. Above 150 km/h it also gets noticeably louder, but still acceptable. For people who like to glide along comfortably it's a very good choice; for those who like to drive fast, rather not. It handles dirt tracks well thanks to its ground clearance, and it also takes corners very well. Already somewhat sporty, agile.

Folding tow hitch, partially autonomous driving, lots of useful driver aids, a good multimedia concept, etc., as well as the very good seating position and controls make it attractive.

My previous 2.0L diesel was noticeably better to drive at higher speeds. But yes, times have changed. Not everything is perfect, but overall it has earned its 5 stars when you factor in the price and compare what you get for your money. 1.5 TSI Xperience DSG +XL + ***

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Stefan
10 Jun 2026, 12:17:28

The Seat Ateca is a very affordable SUV with excellent handling and plenty of space for the whole family. A companion that can do it all and is equally suited to everyday use as to long trips fully loaded. A very good choice for the active family that needs a car that fits most needs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nico
20 May 2026, 12:31:33

+ Great, firm seats, large boot for such a compact car, good fuel economy, lots of interior space, uncomplicated controls, very agile and safe handling, good build quality, very good steering, good braking performance, relatively small turning circle
- Very poor voice control and navigation, cockpit display too small with very small fonts and symbols, steering wheel too thin, seats too flat despite electric adjustment, poor engine soundproofing, tank far too small, complicated maintenance (oil change appalling), undersized rear brake, fuel filler on the wrong side, sound almost without bass (Beats)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Maserati Quattroporte

The Maserati Quattroporte is a grand touring saloon that wraps Italian drama and handcrafted luxury around a chassis that clearly wants to be driven. For buyers who prefer emotion to spreadsheet-friendly logic, it makes a memorable entrance and rewards spirited journeys with a sonorous exhaust and sharp steering.

details
Medium-18791-MaseratiQuattroporteTrofeoMY22
Medium-18788-MaseratiQuattroporteTrofeoMY22
Medium-18790-MaseratiQuattroporteTrofeoMY22

Reviews Maserati Quattroporte

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Ateca turns the sensible family SUV into a pocket rocket with sharper suspension, a punchier engine and aggressive styling that makes commuting feel like a weekend trackday. If you prefer lower running costs, more comfort and smarter value, the SEAT Ateca is the clear choice — practical, …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Ateca leans toward a roomier, more driver-focused experience while the Kamiq prioritizes city-friendly practicality and efficiency. This comparison will focus on space, driving dynamics, equipment and …
Audi Q3
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology features, offering a luxurious driving experience. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca impresses with its sporty design and excellent value, making it a practical choice for those seeking both …
CUPRA Formentor
SEAT Ateca
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the CUPRA Formentor and SEAT Ateca reveal distinct personalities, with the Formentor offering a sportier, coupe-inspired design and dynamic handling thanks to its performance-tuned CUPRA badge. The Ateca, a robust and more traditional SUV, excels in practicality and …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
SEAT Ateca
Volvo XC40
VS
SEAT Ateca and Volvo XC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the SEAT Ateca or the Volvo XC40 …
BMW X1
SEAT Ateca
VS
BMW X1 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW X1 or the SEAT Ateca is the …
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Suzuki Vitara are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want everyday practicality with a bit of style, but they take different routes to get there. The Ateca favours sharper driving dynamics, a more refined cabin and stronger tech, while the Vitara prioritises value, straightforward …
SEAT Ateca
Maserati Quattroporte

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
Price
147,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
11.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 144 g/km
co2
252 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
Curb weight
2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
510 L
Trunk capacity
530 L
Length
-
Length
5,262 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,948 mm
Height
-
Height
1,481 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
516 - 525 kg
Payload
485 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Power HP
430 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
288 km/h
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
580 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
316 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
2,979 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
SEAT
Brand
Maserati
What drive types are available for the SEAT Ateca?

The SEAT Ateca is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.