VS

SEAT Ateca vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (25,100 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SEAT Ateca or Suzuki Swace?

SEAT Ateca vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

SEAT Ateca

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SEAT Ateca is noticeably cheaper – starting at 25,100 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,772 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the SEAT Ateca with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the SEAT Ateca offers very slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the SEAT Ateca is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

Ateca

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Ateca is marginally lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 130 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers slightly more boot space – 596 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Ateca carries clearly more – 525 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The SEAT Ateca is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,100
Ateca

SEAT Ateca

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SEAT Ateca

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ
SEAT-Ateca_012
SEAT-Ateca_011
SEAT-Ateca_006
SEAT-Ateca_004

Reviews SEAT Ateca

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Nico
20 May 2026, 12:31:33

+ Great, firm seats, large boot for such a compact car, good fuel economy, lots of interior space, uncomplicated controls, very agile and safe handling, good build quality, very good steering, good braking performance, relatively small turning circle
- Very poor voice control and navigation, cockpit display too small with very small fonts and symbols, steering wheel too thin, seats too flat despite electric adjustment, poor engine soundproofing, tank far too small, complicated maintenance (oil change appalling), undersized rear brake, fuel filler on the wrong side, sound almost without bass (Beats)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
SEAT Ateca
VS
As compact SUVs that balance practicality and value, the Hyundai Tucson and SEAT Ateca are popular choices for buyers seeking everyday comfort with sensible running costs. This comparison cuts through the specs to show which model — the Tucson or the Ateca — suits your needs better, whether you …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq offer distinct yet appealing options for buyers. The Ateca impresses with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it a favorite among those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands out for its …
SEAT Ateca
Toyota RAV4
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Toyota RAV4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ateca
VS
SEAT Arona and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi Q3
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology features, offering a luxurious driving experience. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca impresses with its sporty design and excellent value, making it a practical choice for those seeking both …
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Suzuki Vitara are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want everyday practicality with a bit of style, but they take different routes to get there. The Ateca favours sharper driving dynamics, a more refined cabin and stronger tech, while the Vitara prioritises value, straightforward …
SEAT Ateca
Volvo XC40
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 144 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
510 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
516 - 525 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
SEAT
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the SEAT Ateca?

The SEAT Ateca is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.