In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, the SEAT Tarraco and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their spacious interiors and practicality. Both vehicles share Volkswagen Group’s robust engineering, but the Tarraco leans towards a sportier design, while the Kodiaq offers a more traditional, understated aesthetic. Ultimately, buyers will find that the choice between the two often comes down to personal style and brand loyalty, as both excel in comfort and technology.
The SUV market has been burgeoning, presenting buyers with numerous choices that blend performance, comfort, and technology. Among the standout competitors in this segment, the SEAT Tarraco and Skoda Kodiaq emerge as two popular options. Each model boasts unique features and advantages, making them worthy of a thorough comparison. Let’s dive into the technical specifications and innovations of these two remarkable SUVs.
Starting with their dimensions, the SEAT Tarraco measures 4758 mm in length and offers a width of 1864 mm. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq has a slightly taller stature, with an overall height of 1683 mm as compared to the Tarraco's 1679 mm. In terms of trunk capacity, the Kodiaq leads with 910 liters, while the Tarraco provides a respectable 745 liters, ensuring ample storage for families and adventurers alike.
When it comes to engine options, both the Tarraco and Kodiaq offer a variety of powertrains catering to different driving preferences. The Tarraco features a robust lineup of engines including a petrol variant and a diesel option, with outputs ranging from 150 HP to 204 HP. Similarly, the Kodiaq provides various choices including plugin hybrid technology, ensuring efficient performance with emissions as low as 9 g/km of CO2.
The Kodiaq's powertrain options include a 150 HP petrol engine, a more potent 204 HP plugin hybrid, and a diesel variant delivering 193 HP. Notably, the electric range for the plug-in hybrid Kodiaq is up to 123 km, showcasing its capabilities for eco-conscious drivers. Both vehicles come with advanced automatic transmission systems, enhancing the driving experience.
Acceleration is another key area where these two SUVs offer competitive differences. The Tarraco can sprint from 0-100 km/h in as fast as 7.8 seconds, while the Kodiaq features a similar range with times from 7.8 to 9.7 seconds depending on the engine choice. The Kodiaq also boasts a slightly higher maximum speed of 226 km/h compared to the Tarraco's top speed of 210 km/h, highlighting its sporty character.
Fuel consumption figures are crucial for modern drivers. The SEAT Tarraco ranges from a consumption of 5.4 L/100km to 6.2 L/100km depending on the chosen engine. The Skoda Kodiaq, with its advanced engineering, offers even better figures, especially with its hybrid configuration, achieving as little as 0.4 L/100km under electric mode. This efficiency shows Skoda's commitment to sustainability without sacrificing performance.
On the interior front, both the Tarraco and Kodiaq provide a blend of comfort and technology. Each SUV seats five passengers comfortably and comes equipped with advanced infotainment systems that support modern connectivity features. The Kodiaq edges out with more customizable options and higher-end materials available, ensuring a premium feel inside.
Safety is paramount in both models, with advanced driver-assistance systems incorporated into their design. The Tarraco offers features like lane assist and adaptive cruise control, similar to the Kodiaq, which includes additional innovations such as blind-spot monitoring and a comprehensive safety package that has received high ratings in safety assessments.
Ultimately, choosing between the SEAT Tarraco and Skoda Kodiaq boils down to individual preferences. The Tarraco offers a more sporty drive with sleek styling and excellent performance metrics, while the Kodiaq shines in practicality, efficiency, and overall comfort. Both SUVs excel in their own right, making them frontrunners in the competitive SUV market. Whether you prioritize speed, technology, or space, each offers compelling reasons to consider them as your next vehicle.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
-
|
Price
about 36000 - 49600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
113 - 123
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
-
|
co2
9 - 186
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
-
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
-
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1661 - 1859
kg
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910
L
|
Length
-
|
Length
4758 - 4761
mm
|
Width
-
|
Width
1864
mm
|
Height
-
|
Height
1663 - 1683
mm
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
497 - 538
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
-
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
-
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
-
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
-
|
Power HP
150 - 265
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
-
|
Power kW
110 - 195
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
-
|
Top speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
-
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
Brand
-
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.